142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14166043)
1. FACTOR ANALYSIS OF OBJECTIVE INK BLOT TEST SCORES.
BRIDGES CC
Percept Mot Skills; 1964 Apr; 18():489-92. PubMed ID: 14166043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. THE RORSCHACH AND HOLTZMAN AS MEASURES OF PATHOGNOMIC VERBALIZATION.
WHITAKER L
J Consult Psychol; 1965 Apr; 29():181-3. PubMed ID: 14282429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Howard ink blot test].
SCHACHTER M
Osp Psichiatr; 1955; 23(4):285-302. PubMed ID: 13335260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of Rorschach and Howard ink blot tests on a schizophrenic population from a content point of view.
SCOTT EM
J Clin Psychol; 1958 Apr; 14(2):156-7. PubMed ID: 13513812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Projective methodologies.
Fisher S
Annu Rev Psychol; 1967; 18():165-90. PubMed ID: 5333546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Whose experience?
Lyons J
J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1967 Aug; 31(4):11-6. PubMed ID: 4383006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Some basic psychologic investigations relevant to schizophrenia.
Piotrowski ZA
Ment Hyg; 1966 Oct; 50(4):536-40. PubMed ID: 5338933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. FREQUENCY HYPOTHESIS AND CONTENT ANALYSIS OF PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES.
WALLACE J; SECHREST L
J Consult Psychol; 1963 Oct; 27():387-93. PubMed ID: 14076394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The ink blot test as a brief projective technique: a preliminary report.
DORKEN H
Am J Orthopsychiatry; 1950 Oct; 20(4):828-33. PubMed ID: 14789971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. CHANGES IN INKBLOT PERCEPTION WITH PRESENTATION OF THE HOLTZMAN INKBLOT TECHNIQUE AS AN "INTELLIGENCE TEST".
HERRON EW
J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1964 Dec; 28():442-7. PubMed ID: 14242367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The human content response in the Holtzman Inkblot Technique.
Fernald PS; Linden JD
J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1966 Oct; 30(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 5339574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. RELATION BETWEEN BARRIER SCORES AND AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR.
MEGARGEE EI
J Abnorm Psychol; 1965 Aug; 70():307-11. PubMed ID: 14341716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the Rorschach and Behn-Rorschach inkblot tests.
EICHLER RM
J Consult Psychol; 1951 Jun; 15(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 14841289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of Objective Evidence in Rorschach Ink Blot Test: An Eye Tracking Study.
Roy AK; Nasreen S; Majumder D; Mahadevappa M; Guha R; Mukhopadhyay J
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():1391-1394. PubMed ID: 31946152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ADAPTATION TO INKBLOT STIMULI: EFFECTS OF ORDER OF PRESENTATION, CONTEXT AND STIMULI CHARACTERISTICS.
BLOCK WE; GREENFIELD L
J Clin Psychol; 1965 Jul; 21():301-4. PubMed ID: 14332201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. THE COMPONENTS OF EMPATHY AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO THE PROJECTION OF HUMAN MOVEMENT RESPONSES.
MUELLER WJ; ABELES N
J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1964 Sep; 28():322-30. PubMed ID: 14210881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Howard ink blot test: a descriptive manual.
HOWARD JW
J Clin Psychol; 1953 Jul; 9(3):209-54. PubMed ID: 13061608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. INKBLOT PERCEPTION AND THE PROCESS-REACTIVE DISTINCTION.
ULLMANN LP; ECK RA
J Clin Psychol; 1965 Jul; 21():311-3. PubMed ID: 14332204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. PERFORMANCE OF HIGH-AND LOW-ANXIOUS CHILDREN ON THE HOLTZMAN INKBLOT TECHNIQUE.
SWARTZ JD
Child Dev; 1965 Jun; 36():569-75. PubMed ID: 14300876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. TOLERANCE FOR UNAMBIGUOUS FEEDBACK.
FELDMAN SE; RICE JK
J Pers Soc Psychol; 1965 Sep; 2():341-7. PubMed ID: 14333306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
