These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1416696)

  • 21. Delay to invasive investigation and revascularisation for coronary heart disease in south west Thames region: a two tier system?
    Marber M; MacRae C; Joy M
    BMJ; 1991 May; 302(6786):1189-91. PubMed ID: 2043817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Coronary angiography and revascularization: defining procedural indications through formal group processes. The Canadian Revascularization Panel, the Canadian Coronary Angiography Panel.
    Naylor CD; McGlynn EA; Leape LL; Pinfold SP; Bernstein SJ; Hilborne LH; Park RE; Kahan JP; Brook RH
    Can J Cardiol; 1994; 10(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 8111670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Detection and classification of inappropriate hospital stay.
    Butler JS; Barrett BJ; Kent G; Haire R; Parfrey PS
    Clin Invest Med; 1996 Aug; 19(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 8853573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hyperkinetic gallbladder: an indication for cholecystectomy?
    Lindholm EB; Alberty JB; Hansbourgh F; Upp JR; Lopoo J
    Am Surg; 2013 Sep; 79(9):882-4. PubMed ID: 24069981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Porcelain Gallbladder: No Longer an Indication for Prophylactic Cholecystectomy.
    Chen GL; Akmal Y; DiFronzo AL; Vuong B; O'Connor V
    Am Surg; 2015 Oct; 81(10):936-40. PubMed ID: 26463284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Oral cholecystographic findings and the incidence of wound infection after cholecystectomy.
    Hollands MJ; May AR; Edwards JM; Nash AG
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1983 Feb; 156(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 6823652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of varying panel membership on ratings of appropriateness in consensus panels: a comparison of a multi- and single disciplinary panel.
    Coulter I; Adams A; Shekelle P
    Health Serv Res; 1995 Oct; 30(4):577-91. PubMed ID: 7591782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Appropriateness variation in cholecystectomy.
    Quintana JM; Cabriada J; López de Tejada I; Perdigo L; Aróstegui I; Bilbao A; Garay I
    Eur J Public Health; 2004 Sep; 14(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 15369029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cholecystectomy in the elderly.
    Margiotta SJ; Willis IH; Wallack MK
    Am Surg; 1988 Jan; 54(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 3337481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Analysis of the most appropriate surgical treatment for acute cholecystitis by applying the RAND/UCLA method].
    Díaz-Gómez D; Parra-Membrives P; Villegas-Portero R; Molina-Linde M; Gómez-Bujedo L; Lacalle-Remigio JR
    Cir Esp; 2012; 90(7):453-9. PubMed ID: 22771292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Incidental appendectomy with cholecystectomy: is the increased risk justified?
    Andrew MH; Roty AR
    Am Surg; 1987 Oct; 53(10):553-7. PubMed ID: 3674597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Toward a systems quality paradigm: relating health outcomes, resource expenditures, and appropriateness of cholecystectomy patients.
    Bradbury RC; Golec JH; Steen PM
    Health Serv Manage Res; 1997 Nov; 10(4):231-44. PubMed ID: 10174513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Current practice in the management of acute cholecystitis.
    Cameron IC; Chadwick C; Phillips J; Johnson AG
    Br J Surg; 2000 Mar; 87(3):362-73. PubMed ID: 10718813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is a policy of cervical screening for all women attending a genito-urinary medicine clinic justified?
    Stedman Y; Woodman CB; Donnelly BJ
    J Public Health Med; 1995 Mar; 17(1):90-2. PubMed ID: 7786575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development of appropriateness criteria for colonoscopy: comparison between a standardized expert panel and an evidence-based medicine approach.
    Nicollier-Fahrni A; Vader JP; Froehlich F; Gonvers JJ; Burnand B
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2003 Feb; 15(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 12630797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quality assessment of cataract surgery in Denmark - risk of retinal detachment and postoperative endophthalmitis.
    Bjerrum SS
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 93 Thesis 2():1-15. PubMed ID: 25712600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Indications for cholecystectomy: the results of a consensus panel approach.
    Fraser GM; Pilpel D; Hollis S; Kosecoff J; Brook RH
    Qual Assur Health Care; 1993 Mar; 5(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 8457691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Case selection and appropriateness of coronary angiography and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in British Columbia and Ontario.
    Anderson GM; Pinfold SP; Hux JE; Naylor CD
    Can J Cardiol; 1997 Mar; 13(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 9117912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A current profile and assessment of north american cholecystectomy: results from the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program.
    Ingraham AM; Cohen ME; Ko CY; Hall BL
    J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Aug; 211(2):176-86. PubMed ID: 20670855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. 2001 survey on primary medical care in Singapore.
    Emmanuel SC; Phua HP; Cheong PY
    Singapore Med J; 2004 May; 45(5):199-213. PubMed ID: 15143355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.