These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14173413)

  • 21. Audiovisual alignment of co-speech gestures to speech supports word learning in 2-year-olds.
    Jesse A; Johnson EK
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 May; 145():1-10. PubMed ID: 26765249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Listeners' effects on autobiographical memory for recent events.
    Grysman A; Baime M; Cantor E
    Memory; 2023 Nov; 31(10):1425-1436. PubMed ID: 37850875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Word Forms Reflect Trade-Offs Between Speaker Effort and Robust Listener Recognition.
    Meylan SC; Griffiths TL
    Cogn Sci; 2024 Jul; 48(7):e13478. PubMed ID: 38980972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Representation of speech variability.
    Bent T; Holt RF
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2017 Jul; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 28160440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Listeners' perceptions of the certainty and honesty of a speaker are associated with a common prosodic signature.
    Goupil L; Ponsot E; Richardson D; Reyes G; Aucouturier JJ
    Nat Commun; 2021 Feb; 12(1):861. PubMed ID: 33558510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Effects of the Literal Meaning of Emotional Phrases on the Identification of Vocal Emotions.
    Shigeno S
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Feb; 47(1):195-213. PubMed ID: 29080117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of listeners' comprehension on judgments of speakers' height and weight.
    Lass NJ; Riley AL; Giachetti JA; Cline AL; Dodson CK; Bellotte SL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Oct; 53(2):647-53. PubMed ID: 7312549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The artful dodger: answering the wrong question the right way.
    Rogers T; Norton MI
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Jun; 17(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 21517203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Multidimensional Scaling Study of Native and Non-Native Listeners' Perception of Second Language Speech.
    Foote JA; Trofimovich P
    Percept Mot Skills; 2016 Apr; 122(2):470-89. PubMed ID: 27166328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Does the degree of linguistic experience (native versus nonnative) modulate the degree to which listeners can benefit from a delay between the onset of the maskers and the onset of the target speech?
    Ben-David BM; Avivi-Reich M; Schneider BA
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():9-18. PubMed ID: 27496539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Examining the difference in error detection when listening to native and non-native speakers.
    Sanders G; de Bruin A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Jul; 76(7):1547-1560. PubMed ID: 36250594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Untrained listeners' ratings of speech disorders in a group with cleft palate: a comparison with speech and language pathologists' ratings.
    Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2009; 44(5):656-74. PubMed ID: 18821109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The time course of speaker-specific language processing.
    Kroczek LOH; Gunter TC
    Cortex; 2021 Aug; 141():311-321. PubMed ID: 34118750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Embodied communication: speakers' gestures affect listeners' actions.
    Cook SW; Tanenhaus MK
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 19682672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Listeners' adaptation to unreliable intonation is speaker-sensitive.
    Roettger TB; Rimland K
    Cognition; 2020 Nov; 204():104372. PubMed ID: 32615469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Children's avoidance of lexical overlap: a pragmatic account.
    Diesendruck G; Markson L
    Dev Psychol; 2001 Sep; 37(5):630-41. PubMed ID: 11552759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of an aphasia ID card on the processing of language produced by a speaker with nonfluent aphasia.
    Ward CB; Mack JE
    J Commun Disord; 2022; 100():106268. PubMed ID: 36137321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. I see what you meant to say: Anticipating speech errors during online sentence processing.
    Lowder MW; Ferreira F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Oct; 148(10):1849-1858. PubMed ID: 30556724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Audiovisual sentence recognition not predicted by susceptibility to the McGurk effect.
    Van Engen KJ; Xie Z; Chandrasekaran B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):396-403. PubMed ID: 27921268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Unforeseen Consequences of Interacting With Non-Native Speakers.
    Lev-Ari S; Ho E; Keysar B
    Top Cogn Sci; 2018 Oct; 10(4):835-849. PubMed ID: 29411944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.