These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14177687)

  • 1. OPPOSED GENERALIZATION GRADIENTS BASED UPON CONDITIONAL DISCRIMINATION TRAINING.
    BONEAU CA; HONIG WK
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Jul; 68():89-93. PubMed ID: 14177687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. STIMULUS ASPECTS OF AVERSIVE CONTROLS: STIMULUS GENERALIZATION OF CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION FOLLOWING DISCRIMINATION TRAINING.
    HOFFMAN HS; FLESHLER M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 May; 7(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 14143911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION OF A POSITIVE CONDITIONED REINFORCER. II. EFFECTS OF DISCRIMINATION TRAINING.
    THOMAS DR; CARONITE SC
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Oct; 68():402-6. PubMed ID: 14216499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PREDICTION OF DISCRIMINATION FROM GENERALIZATION AFTER VARIATIONS IN SCHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENT.
    HABER A; KALISH HI
    Science; 1963 Oct; 142(3590):412-3. PubMed ID: 14056717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION ALONG A LIGHT FLICKER RATE CONTINUUM AFTER DISCRIMINATION TRAINING WITH SEVERAL S-'S.
    SLOANE HN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 May; 7(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 14143907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. OPERANT DISCRIMINATION LEARNING AND STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AS A FUNCTION OF REWARD EXPOSURE.
    DICKSON JF; THOMAS DR
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1963 Oct; 56():829-33. PubMed ID: 14050168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. THE EFFECT OF DISCRIMINATIVE TRAINING ON THE GRADIENT OF STIMULUS-GENERALIZATION.
    HEINEMANN EG; RUDOLPH RL
    Am J Psychol; 1963 Dec; 76():653-8. PubMed ID: 14082662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION ALONG THE DIMENSION OF ANGULARITY: A COMPARISON OF TRAINING PROCEDURES.
    NEWMAN FL; BARON MR
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1965 Aug; 60():59-63. PubMed ID: 14334244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PREDICTION OF DISCRIMINATION FROM GENERALIZATION FOLLOWING VARIATIONS IN DEPRIVATION LEVEL.
    KALISH HI; HABER A
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1965 Aug; 60():125-8. PubMed ID: 14334226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of different measures of response strength in the study of stimulus generalization.
    Thomas DR; Konick DS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1966 May; 9(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 5948922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AS A FUNCTION OF DRIVE SHIFT.
    ZAJONC RB; CROSS DV
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Apr; 69():363-8. PubMed ID: 14286305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of discrimination training in the generalization of punishment.
    Honig WK
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1966 Jul; 9(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 5961506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Generalization and response mediation of a conditional discrimination.
    Eckerman DA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1970 May; 13(3):301-16. PubMed ID: 5483825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. STIMULUS ASPECTS OF AVERSIVE CONTROLS: THE EFFECTS OF RESPONSE CONTINGENT SHOCK.
    HOFFMAN HS; FLESHLER M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1965 Mar; 8(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 14269567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. FORCE GRADIENTS IN STIMULUS GENERALIZATION.
    COLE JL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1965 Jul; 8(4):231-41. PubMed ID: 14342030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE-REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY.
    HEARST E; KORESKO MB; POPPEN R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Sep; 7(5):369-80. PubMed ID: 14218295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. THE EFFECT OF ATTENTION ON THE SLOPE OF GENERALIZATION GRADIENTS.
    MACKINTOSH NJ
    Br J Psychol; 1965 Feb; 56():87-93. PubMed ID: 14292058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. GENERALIZATION OF AUDITORY INTENSITY AS A FUNCTION OF SMALL AMOUNTS OF DISCRIMINATION TRAINING.
    PIERREL R; SHERMAN JG; FISCHMAN MW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1963 Oct; 6(4):545-8. PubMed ID: 14055951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for positive induction in discrimination learning.
    Senf GM; Miller NE
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1967 Aug; 64(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 6064414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of interdimensional training on stimulus generalization.
    Switalski RW; Lyons J; Thomas DR
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Nov; 72(5):661-6. PubMed ID: 5972005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.