These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14177996)
1. NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF OPTOMETRISTS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, VS. JOHN REISS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. LEWIS JA Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom; 1964 Jul; 41():438-44. PubMed ID: 14177996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. NEW JERSEY SUPERIOR COURT RULES ON CONTACT LENS FITTING BY OPTICIANS. HIRSCH MJ Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom; 1964 Jul; 41():436-7. PubMed ID: 14177995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. OPTOMETRY practice acts: constitutionality of regulatory provisions (New Jersey). J Am Med Assoc; 1951 Feb; 145(7):510-1. PubMed ID: 14794477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A seven year survey of the contact lens prescribing habits of Canadian optometrists. Woods CA; Jones DA; Jones LW; Morgan PB Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jun; 84(6):505-10. PubMed ID: 17568320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. D.B. v. Bloom. U.S. District Court, D. New Jersey Fed Suppl; 1995 Aug; 896():166-73. PubMed ID: 11648292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. NEW Jersey ban on displays upheld-branch offices limited to two-examination records held property of prescribing optometrist. Opt J Rev Optom; 1950 Nov; 87(21):50. PubMed ID: 14785929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fairness to Contact Lens Consumers Act: the final rule. Seibel DB Optometry; 2004 Aug; 75(8):527-34. PubMed ID: 15372791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Nolite nos contingere. The small difference as exemplified with contact lenses]. Mehrle G Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2000 Jul; 217(1):A3. PubMed ID: 10949808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fairness to Contact Lens Consumers Act: complying is a serious matter. Plunkett LR Optometry; 2004 Mar; 75(3):197-8. PubMed ID: 15058703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Guidelines for an occupational vision program. Gunning JN; Soles EM; Miller SC J Am Optom Assoc; 1979 Aug; 50(8):935-8. PubMed ID: 501002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trends of contact lens prescribing in Jordan. Haddad MF; Bakkar M; Gammoh Y; Morgan P Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Oct; 39(5):385-8. PubMed ID: 27364560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Snyder v. Mekhjian. New Jersey. Supreme Court Atl Report; 1991 Jul; 593():318-34. PubMed ID: 11648304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Practitioner influence on contact lens prescribing in the UK. Efron N; Morgan PB Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Aug; 32(4):185-6. PubMed ID: 19409838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pilgrim Medical Group v. New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners. U.S. District Court, D. New Jersey Fed Suppl; 1985 Jul; 613():837-49. PubMed ID: 11648369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]