These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. EFFECT OF PARTIAL REINFORCEMENT ON THE EXTINCTION OF A CLASSICALLY CONDITIONED RESPONSE IN THE GOLDFISH. BERGER BD; YARCZOWER M; BITTERMAN ME J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1965 Jun; 59():399-405. PubMed ID: 14313780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. EFFECTS OF PARTIAL REINFORCEMENT WITH ACID ON THE CLASSICALLY CONDITIONED SALIVARY RESPONSE IN DOGS. FITZGERALD RD J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1963 Dec; 56():1056-60. PubMed ID: 14100946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. DIFFERENTIAL EYELID CONDITIONING AS A FUNCTION OF THE FREQUENCY AND INTENSITY OF AUDITORY CSS. MOORE JW J Exp Psychol; 1964 Sep; 68():250-9. PubMed ID: 14215423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. EFFECT OF A NUMBER OF ACQUISITION TRIALS AND THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF THE UCS ON EXTINCTION OF THE EYELID CR. SPENCE KW; RUTLEDGE EF; TALBOTT JH J Exp Psychol; 1963 Sep; 66():286-91. PubMed ID: 14054385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. EXTRAVERSION AND THE ACQUISITION OF EYEBLINK AND GSR CONDITIONED RESPONSES. EYSENCK HJ Psychol Bull; 1965 Apr; 63():258-70. PubMed ID: 14320742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. UCS INTENSITY AND THE ASSOCIATIVE STRENGTH OF THE EYELID CR WITH A MASKED CONDITIONING PROCEDURE. HOMZIE MJ; WEISS G J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jan; 69():101-3. PubMed ID: 14256240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the probability of reinforcement. Newman FL J Exp Psychol; 1967 Nov; 75(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 6079859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Arithmetic correctness as the discriminandum in classical and differential eyelid conditioning. Fleming RA; Grant DA; North JA; Levy CM J Exp Psychol; 1968 Jun; 77(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 5655122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of partial reinforcement of acquisition and extinction of the conditioned eyeblink in a masking situation. Spence KW; Platt JR J Exp Psychol; 1967 Jun; 74(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 6048467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Delay of positive reinforcement in instrumental eyelid conditioning. Cerekwicki LE; Grant DA J Exp Psychol; 1967 Nov; 75(3):360-4. PubMed ID: 6079851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Resistance to extinction and the pattern of reinforcement: II. Effect of successive alternation of blocks of reinforced and unreinforced trials upon the conditioned eyelid response to light. HAKE HW; GRANT DA J Exp Psychol; 1951 Mar; 41(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 14841332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of stimulus change and drive level on extinction of the conditioned eyelid response. Cobb NJ; Price LE; Abbott DW Psychol Rep; 1967 Jun; 20(3):775-8. PubMed ID: 6042482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. EFFECTS OF PATTERN OF REINFORCEMENT AND VERBAL INFORMATION ON ACQUISITION AND EXTINCTION OF THE EYELID CR. HICKOK CW; GRANT DA J Gen Psychol; 1964 Oct; 71():279-89. PubMed ID: 14212162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Eyelid trace conditioning, CS intensity, CS-UCS interval, and a correction for "spontaneous" blinking. Lipkin SG; Moore JW J Exp Psychol; 1966 Aug; 72(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 5966620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]