These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14203983)
1. [RESPECTIVE INDICATIONS OF VENTOUSE AND FORCEPS]. MAHON R; BAROUK L Maternite; 1964 Jun; 13():178-89. PubMed ID: 14203983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [DELIVERY BY OBSTETRICAL VENTOUSE IN SAIGON. ITS PLACE BESIDE FORCEPS AND CESAREAN SECTION]. GOURILLON H Med Trop (Mars); 1964; 24():71-6. PubMed ID: 14142044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [FORCEPS IN CURRENT OBSTETRICAL PRACTICE. ANALYSIS OF 342 CASES]. SALVATORE CA; PINOTTI JA; OHELING R Rev Ginecol Obstet (Sao Paulo); 1965 Mar; 116():136-46. PubMed ID: 14331843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. THE VACUUM-EXTRACTOR. II. VALUE IN RELATION TO FORCEPS AND RANGE OF INDICATIONS. Lang P Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1964; 43(S1):57-85. PubMed ID: 14150609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [SHOULD FORCEPS BE ELIMINATED FROM THE OBSTETRICAL SURGICAL ARSENAL?]. DA CUNHA DP Rev Clin Inst Matern Lisb; 1963; 14():13-20. PubMed ID: 14201922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Vacuum or forceps extraction?]. MANASSE JP Sem Med; 1962 Sep; 121():1297-301. PubMed ID: 13932696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Extractor or forceps?]. ROSA P Brux Med; 1962 Dec; 42():1561-7. PubMed ID: 13974747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries. Mesleh RA; Al-Sawadi HM; Kurdi AM Saudi Med J; 2002 Jul; 23(7):811-3. PubMed ID: 12174231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY IN NEWBORN INFANTS AFTER NORMAL DELIVERY AND AFTER FORCEPS AND VACUUM EXTRACTION]. CACAVA KV Cesk Gynekol; 1964 Dec; 43():725-30. PubMed ID: 14250686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [IS TUBERCULOSS AN INDICATION FOR FORCEPS DELIVERY?]. KRIEGER E Zentralbl Gynakol; 1964 Nov; 86():1678-80. PubMed ID: 14325785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [SPECULUM DELIVERY AND VACUUM EXTRACTION IN CLASSICAL OBSTETRICS]. WILLE P Zentralbl Gynakol; 1964 Aug; 86():1065-81. PubMed ID: 14249747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative clinical study of the vacuum extractor and forceps. I. Preliminary observations. NYIRJESY I; HAWKS BL; FALLS HC; MUNSAT TL; PIERCE WE Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1963 Apr; 85():1071-82. PubMed ID: 13939310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparative measurements on intracranial pressure following the use of the forceps and vacuum extractor]. BREHM H Arch Gynakol; 1963; 198():579-83. PubMed ID: 14015183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [OPERATIONS IN OBSTETRICS. APPARENT SIMPLIFICATION OF THE ACTUAL PROCEDURES]. LEON J Clin Lab (Zaragoza); 1964 Jul; 78():80-6. PubMed ID: 14182610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [THE CHANGE IN OBSTETRICAL SURGERY DURING THE LAST 30 YEARS (EXEMPLIFIED BY PROCEDURES IN HAMBURG)]. DIETEL H; KEDING G Med Welt; 1964 Aug; 32():1679-88. PubMed ID: 14291143 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Forceps and ventouse. Frequency, indications and complications related to their use. Clinico-statistical contribution]. Borin B; Burigo D Minerva Ginecol; 1986 Apr; 38(4):321-4. PubMed ID: 3725174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [7 years of forceps and vacuum extractor]. HACKL H Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1963 Jan; 75():43-6. PubMed ID: 13951691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]