These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1421456)

  • 1. Predictability and reliability of hearing aid benefit measured using the PHAB.
    Cox RM; Rivera IM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Jul; 3(4):242-54. PubMed ID: 1421456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 1995 Apr; 16(2):176-86. PubMed ID: 7789669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two questionnaires for patient-assessed hearing aid benefit.
    Cox RM; Gilmore C; Alexander GC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1991 Jul; 2(3):134-45. PubMed ID: 1768881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of the Profile of Hearing Aid Performance (PHAP).
    Cox RM; Gilmore C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):343-57. PubMed ID: 2359275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
    Narendran MM; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test-retest reliability of the profile of hearing aid performance.
    Nelson CT; Palmer CV
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Oct; 37(5):1211-5. PubMed ID: 7823563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maturation of hearing aid benefit: objective and subjective measurements.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 1992 Jun; 13(3):131-41. PubMed ID: 1397752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models.
    Davis A; Smith P; Ferguson M; Stephens D; Gianopoulos I
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Oct; 11(42):1-294. PubMed ID: 17927921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short- and long-term outcomes of adult audiological rehabilitation.
    Chisolm TH; Abrams HB; McArdle R
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):464-77. PubMed ID: 15599193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examination of differences between successful and unsuccessful elderly hearing aid candidates matched for age, hearing loss and gender.
    Humes LE; Wilson DL; Humes AC
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Oct; 42(7):432-41. PubMed ID: 14582640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Telephone usage in the hearing-impaired population.
    Kepler LJ; Terry M; Sweetman RH
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):311-9. PubMed ID: 1487091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of self-efficacy, expectations, and readiness on hearing aid outcomes.
    Ferguson MA; Woolley A; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Jul; 55 Suppl 3():S34-41. PubMed ID: 27266542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of hearing aids and frequency modulation technology on results from the communication profile for the hearing impaired.
    Lewis MS; Valente M; Horn JE; Crandell C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Apr; 16(4):250-61. PubMed ID: 16050335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of hearing aid cost on perceived benefit in older adults.
    Newman CW; Hug GA; Wharton JA; Jacobson GP
    Ear Hear; 1993 Aug; 14(4):285-9. PubMed ID: 8405732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving the quality and applicability of the Dutch scales of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired using item response theory.
    Mokkink LB; Knol DL; van Nispen RM; Kramer SE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 53(3):556-71. PubMed ID: 20530379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychosocial correlates of hearing aid adjustment.
    Kricos PB; Erdman S; Bratt GW; Williams DW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Apr; 18(4):304-22. PubMed ID: 17580726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users.
    Olsen SØ; Lantz J; Nielsen LH; Brännström KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):678-88. PubMed ID: 22731922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recognition of speech in noise with hearing aids using dual microphones.
    Valente M; Fabry DA; Potts LG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1995 Nov; 6(6):440-9. PubMed ID: 8580504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of benefit from linear hearing aids in nonreverberant listening environments.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 1993 Aug; 14(4):275-84. PubMed ID: 8405731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.