These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14215571)
1. DOMICILIARY MIDWIFERY IS IT JUSTIFIABLE?A REVIEW OF OVER 1000 CASES IN GENERAL PRACTICE. RUTTER P Lancet; 1964 Dec; 2(7371):1228-30. PubMed ID: 14215571 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. DOMICILIARY OBSTETRICS. THE CASE AGAINST DOMICILIARY MIDWIFERY. EDWARDS RL; HANDFIELD-JONES RP; TOMKINSON JS Proc R Soc Med; 1964 Mar; 57(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 14130876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. OBSTETRICS IN GENERAL PRACTICE. HOME OR HOSPITAL? STALLWORTHY J Br Med J; 1964 Jul; 2(5402):169-71. PubMed ID: 14150895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. EFFECTS OF EARLY DISCHARGE AFTER HOSPITAL CONFINEMENT. MCEWAN ED Lancet; 1964 Oct; 2(7362):744-5. PubMed ID: 14193961 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "THE NORMAL PUERPERIUM IN TEN DAYS". RHODES P Lancet; 1964 Oct; 2(7362):746-7. PubMed ID: 14193962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Home or hospital births? Adamson GD; Gare DJ JAMA; 1980 May; 243(17):1732-6. PubMed ID: 7365936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Not to be left to nature. Russell JK Lancet; 1966 Jun; 1(7450):1315-7. PubMed ID: 4160889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [EXPERIENCE IN ORGANIZING THE MATERNAL MORTALITY CONTROL]. BABUKHADIVA VI; KLOKOV AK Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1963; 39():122-5. PubMed ID: 14148697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. WHO bid to reduce maternal mortality. Pollock L RCM Midwives; 2005 May; 8(5):188. PubMed ID: 15960320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The maternity services in Britain. Chamberlain R; Jeffcoate TN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1966 Jun; 95(3):436-57. PubMed ID: 5939266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Thoughts on the development of obstetrics in the USA]. Plotz EJ Arch Gynakol; 1967; 204(2):321-7. PubMed ID: 5631199 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [OBSTETRICAL ATTENTION IN THE RURAL ATMOSPHERE]. ALVAREZAMEZQUITA J Salud Publica Mex; 1963; 5():859-63. PubMed ID: 14110532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A GENERAL-PRACTITIONER MATERNITY UNIT; REVIEW OF ONE YEAR'S WORK. REYNOLDS RH Lancet; 1963 Nov; 2(7315):998-1000. PubMed ID: 14059067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [IS VACUUM EXTRACTION IN OBSTETRICS RECOMMENDED FOR THE GENERAL PRACTITIONER?]. RUMMEL A Med Welt; 1963 Oct; 43():2176-9. PubMed ID: 14093061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [ON PROPHYLAXIS IN PREGNANCY AND IN THE 1ST YEAR OF LIFE]. KREUTZFELDT H Manedsskr Prakt Laegegern; 1964 Jun; 42():269-76. PubMed ID: 14157170 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Home or hospital? Why not both? Golding BM Queens Nurs J; 1973 Jul; 16(4):84 passim. PubMed ID: 4489563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [ORGANIZATION OF OBSTETRIC SERVICE IN A RURAL DISTRICT. (EXPERIENCE IN THE BOL'SHE-BEREZNIKI DISTRICT OF THE MORDVINIAN AUTONOMOUS SSR)]. NAZARKIN NIa Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1963; 39():118-22. PubMed ID: 14148696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. MATERNITY SERVICES IN FEDERATION OF MALAYA. LOURDENADIN S Med J Malaya; 1963 Jun; 17():269-73. PubMed ID: 14060503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Obstetric care in the Netherlands. Haspels AA Public Health; 1974 May; 88(4):183-8. PubMed ID: 4445455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [CONSIDERATIONS ON HOSPITALIZATION FOR DELIVERY]. CARNEVALI O Minerva Ginecol; 1964 Jun; 16():479-82. PubMed ID: 14187585 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]