These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14217917)

  • 1. THE ROLE OF CONTEXTUAL CUES IN STIMULUS GENERALIZATION WITH INKBLOT STIMULI.
    SHRADER WK; GOSS AE
    J Gen Psychol; 1964 Oct; 71():293-306. PubMed ID: 14217917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ADAPTATION TO INKBLOT STIMULI: EFFECTS OF ORDER OF PRESENTATION, CONTEXT AND STIMULI CHARACTERISTICS.
    BLOCK WE; GREENFIELD L
    J Clin Psychol; 1965 Jul; 21():301-4. PubMed ID: 14332201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. INKBLOT PERCEPTION AND THE PROCESS-REACTIVE DISTINCTION.
    ULLMANN LP; ECK RA
    J Clin Psychol; 1965 Jul; 21():311-3. PubMed ID: 14332204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CHANGES IN INKBLOT PERCEPTION WITH PRESENTATION OF THE HOLTZMAN INKBLOT TECHNIQUE AS AN "INTELLIGENCE TEST".
    HERRON EW
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1964 Dec; 28():442-7. PubMed ID: 14242367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PERFORMANCE OF HIGH-AND LOW-ANXIOUS CHILDREN ON THE HOLTZMAN INKBLOT TECHNIQUE.
    SWARTZ JD
    Child Dev; 1965 Jun; 36():569-75. PubMed ID: 14300876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. LEVEL OF PERCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT AS REFLECTED IN RESPONSES TO THE HOLTZMAN INKBLOT TECHNIQUE.
    THORPE JS; SWARTZ JD
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1965 Sep; 29():380-6. PubMed ID: 14337529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus generalization as a function of contextual stimuli.
    Helson H; Avant LL
    J Exp Psychol; 1967 Apr; 73(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 6034011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. COMPOUND STIMULI, DRIVE STRENGTH, AND PRIMARY STIMULUS GENERALIZATION.
    HEALEY AF
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 May; 69():536-8. PubMed ID: 14285612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of preliminary verbal conditioning on inkblot test responses.
    SACKS H
    J Proj Tech; 1962 Sep; 26():332-6. PubMed ID: 14495870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. STIMULUS FUNCTIONS IN PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES.
    KENNY DT
    Prog Exp Pers Res; 1964; 72():285-354. PubMed ID: 14348123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. TOLERANCE FOR UNAMBIGUOUS FEEDBACK.
    FELDMAN SE; RICE JK
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1965 Sep; 2():341-7. PubMed ID: 14333306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. FACTOR ANALYSIS OF OBJECTIVE INK BLOT TEST SCORES.
    BRIDGES CC
    Percept Mot Skills; 1964 Apr; 18():489-92. PubMed ID: 14166043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus properties of the Blacky Pictures Test.
    STRICKER G
    J Proj Tech; 1963 Jun; 27():244-7. PubMed ID: 13978861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. RECALL EFFICIENCY AND MEDIATING COGNITIVE EVENTS IN "EXPERIMENTAL REPRESSION".
    D ZURILLA TJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1965 Mar; 1():253-7. PubMed ID: 14328729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [On the problem of anxiety and hostility contents in inkblot test proecures].
    von Rosenstiel L
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1966; 13(4):611-31. PubMed ID: 5340889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The human content response in the Holtzman Inkblot Technique.
    Fernald PS; Linden JD
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1966 Oct; 30(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 5339574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relation of response length to the Holtzman inkblot technique.
    Megargee EI
    J Consult Psychol; 1966 Oct; 30(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 5331058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of an anchor stimulus on the stimulus generalization gradient.
    GANZ L
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Mar; 65():270-9. PubMed ID: 13946425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship of reading improvement to scores on the Holtzman inkblot technique.
    Krippner S
    J Clin Psychol; 1967 Jan; 23(1):114-5. PubMed ID: 5340076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A conceptual model of projective techniques applied to stimulus variations with thematic techniques.
    MURSTEIN BI
    J Consult Psychol; 1959 Feb; 23(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 13641483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.