These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1422657)

  • 1. Portable chest radiography in intensive care: a comparison of computed and conventional radiography.
    Jennings P; Padley SP; Hansell DM
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Oct; 65(778):852-6. PubMed ID: 1422657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of cardiopulmonary devices on chest radiographs: digital vs analog radiographs.
    Thompson MJ; Kubicka RA; Smith C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Dec; 153(6):1165-8. PubMed ID: 2816626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The visibility of a central venous catheter using digital luminescence radiography in intensive care radiology].
    Galanski M; Prokop M; Thorns E; Oestmann JW; Reichelt S; Haubitz B; Milbradt H; Gräser A; Verner L; Schaefer C
    Rofo; 1992 Jan; 156(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 1733477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
    Konen E; Greenberg I; Rozenman J
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bedside Chest Radiographs in the Intensive care Setting: Wireless Direct Radiography Compared to Computed Radiography.
    Audin CR; Aran S; Muse VV; Abbott GF; Ackman JB; Sharma A; Wu CC; Kalra MK; McLoud TC; Shepard JO; Fintelmann FJ; Gilman MD
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2018 Nov; 47(6):397-403. PubMed ID: 29054314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic detection of supporting device positioning in intensive care unit radiography.
    Sheng C; Li L; Pei W
    Int J Med Robot; 2009 Sep; 5(3):332-40. PubMed ID: 19449314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of medical devices in thoracic radiograms in intensive care unit - time to pay attention!
    Moreira AS; Afonso MD; Dinis MR; Santos MC
    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva; 2016 Sep; 28(3):330-334. PubMed ID: 27737432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ["Tubes and lines" in thoracic radiography: malpositioning and complications].
    Wunderbaldinger P
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2001; 151(21-23):524-31. PubMed ID: 11762247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Can digital luminescent radiography substitute for conventional x-ray technics in chest radiography?].
    Neufang KF; Krug B; Lorenz R; Steinbrich W
    Rofo; 1990 May; 152(5):501-9. PubMed ID: 2160680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of thoracic imaging in the intensive care unit.
    Soo E; Edey AJ
    Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2012 Nov; 73(11):612-9. PubMed ID: 23147359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiologic appearance of compromised thoracic catheters, tubes, and wires.
    Dunbar RD
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1984 Sep; 22(3):699-722. PubMed ID: 6382429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pacemaker wires. Difference in performance between AMBER and conventional chest radiography.
    Fransson SG
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Jul; 34(4):419-21. PubMed ID: 8318310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interobserver agreement using computed radiography in the adult intensive care unit.
    Maguire WM; Herman PG; Khan A; Simon-Gabor M; Cruz V; Eacobacci TM
    Acad Radiol; 1994 Sep; 1(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9419458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bedside chest radiography.
    Eisenhuber E; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Prosch H; Schima W
    Respir Care; 2012 Mar; 57(3):427-43. PubMed ID: 22391269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Conventional radiology, digital radiology with photostimulable phosphor, laser digitalization of thoracic radiographic films at the bedside. A comparative study].
    Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Guidarelli G; Sartoni Galloni S
    Radiol Med; 1992 Oct; 84(4):455-8. PubMed ID: 1455031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
    Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.