127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1422661)
1. A figure of merit for the assessment of image intensifier systems.
McRobbie DW; Hancock AP; Castellano IA
Br J Radiol; 1992 Oct; 65(778):878-84. PubMed ID: 1422661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Threshold contrast detail detectability curves for fluoroscopy and digital acquisition using modern image intensifier systems.
Evans DS; Mackenzie A; Lawinski CP; Smith D
Br J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 77(921):751-8. PubMed ID: 15447961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of a quality index in threshold contrast detail detection measurements in television fluoroscopy.
Gallacher DJ; Mackenzie A; Batchelor S; Lynch J; Saunders JE
Br J Radiol; 2003 Jul; 76(907):464-72. PubMed ID: 12857706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance assessment of X-ray image intensified television fluoroscopy systems in New Zealand.
Poletti JL; Le Heron JC
Br J Radiol; 1988 May; 61(725):393-400. PubMed ID: 3382870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Theoretical and experimental studies of the influence of air kerma rate on threshold contrast in diagnostic fluoroscopy systems.
Harrison RM; Day MJ
Phys Med Biol; 1983 Nov; 28(11):1319-31. PubMed ID: 6657744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of a simple Leeds test object for rapid assessment of image intensifiers.
Grant AM; Kehoe TM; Law J
Br J Radiol; 1987 Oct; 60(718):1019-21. PubMed ID: 3676644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality control phantom for flat panel detector X-ray systems.
Chida K; Kaga Y; Haga Y; Takeda K; Zuguchi M
Health Phys; 2013 Jan; 104(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23192093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic flat panel detector versus image intensifier in cardiac imaging: dose and image quality.
Vano E; Geiger B; Schreiner A; Back C; Beissel J
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5731-42. PubMed ID: 16306664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimisation of dose per image in digital imaging.
Marshall NW
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):83-7. PubMed ID: 11487849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Update on the recommended viewing protocol for FAXIL threshold contrast detail detectability test objects used in television fluoroscopy.
Launders JH; McArdle S; Workman A; Cowen AR
Br J Radiol; 1995 Jan; 68(805):70-7. PubMed ID: 7881886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A technique for very high accuracy image intensifier calibration.
Viant WJ; Phillips R; Bielby MS; Zhu Y; Griffiths JG; Mohsen AM; Sherman KP
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 62():379-80. PubMed ID: 10538391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subjective and objective measures of image quality in digital fluoroscopy.
Walsh C; Dowling A; Meade A; Malone J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):34-7. PubMed ID: 16461534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A set of X-ray test objects for image quality control in digital subtraction fluorography. I: Design considerations.
Cowen AR; Haywood JM; Workman A; Clarke OF
Br J Radiol; 1987 Oct; 60(718):1001-9. PubMed ID: 3315090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Threshold contrast detail detectability measurement of the fluoroscopic image quality of a dynamic solid-state digital x-ray image detector.
Davies AG; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Bury RF; Bruijns TJ
Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 11213916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do flat detector cardiac X-ray systems convey advantages over image-intensifier-based systems? Study comparing X-ray dose and image quality.
Davies AG; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Moore J; Sivananthan MU
Eur Radiol; 2007 Jul; 17(7):1787-94. PubMed ID: 17115166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Analysis of frequency-contrast characteristics of digital X-ray image detectors].
Zelikman MI; Kabanov SP; Kokuev AN; Kruchinin SA; Lobov DP
Med Tekh; 2006; (5):23-7. PubMed ID: 17133940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Large-screen image intensifier photofluorography compared with full-size screen-film technique in chest radiography.
Manninen H; Rytkönen H; Soimakallio S; Terho EO; Hentunen J
Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1985; 26(5):525-33. PubMed ID: 4072746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory.
Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fluoroscopic image quality in the film and filmless eras: a standardized comparison performed in coronary interventional facilities.
Laskey W; Wondrow M; Chambers C
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Mar; 58(3):383-90. PubMed ID: 12594708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
