These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1422661)

  • 21. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Sivananthan MU
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 18774353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of performance of a new digital image intensifier fluoroscopy system.
    Dimov A; Vassileva J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):123-6. PubMed ID: 18469348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An alternative approach to contrast-detail testing of X-ray image intensifier systems.
    Kotre CJ; Marshall NW; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Aug; 65(776):686-90. PubMed ID: 1393395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative performance evaluation of a flat detector and an image intensifier angiographic system both used for interventional cardiology procedures in adult and pediatric patients.
    Kordolaimi SD; Salvara AL; Antonakos I; Tsalafoutas IA; Broutzos E; Efstathopoulos EP
    Phys Med; 2013 Mar; 29(2):178-87. PubMed ID: 22398332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Absorption and noise in cesium iodide x-ray image intensifiers.
    Rowlands JA; Taylor KW
    Med Phys; 1983; 10(6):786-95. PubMed ID: 6656692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Soft-copy quality control of digital spot images obtained by using X-ray image intensifiers.
    Peter MB; Pavlicek W; Owen JM
    Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):810-9. PubMed ID: 10966716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [A urological x-ray study table with a 36-cm x-ray image intensifier].
    Melchior H; Lang G
    Urologe A; 1983 Jan; 22(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 6220504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: X-ray image intensifiers for fluoroscopy.
    Wang J; Blackburn TJ
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(5):1471-7. PubMed ID: 10992034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Image display devices (4) - the standard of display quality].
    Hashimoto N
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Feb; 59(2):255-62. PubMed ID: 12668953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On the relationship of image intensifier contrast ratios measured by two techniques.
    Nalcioglu O; Roeck WW; Lando AV; Seibert JA
    Phys Med Biol; 1984 Oct; 29(10):1231-6. PubMed ID: 6494249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Measurement of objective parameters of image quality of film-screen combinations].
    Angerstein W; Wolf M
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1986; 27(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 3961142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
    Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: physics of flat-panel fluoroscopy systems: Survey of modern fluoroscopy imaging: flat-panel detectors versus image intensifiers and more.
    Nickoloff EL
    Radiographics; 2011; 31(2):591-602. PubMed ID: 21415199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Rotatable Quality Control Phantom for Evaluating the Performance of Flat Panel Detectors in Imaging Moving Objects.
    Haga Y; Chida K; Inaba Y; Kaga Y; Meguro T; Zuguchi M
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb; 29(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 26264731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Image magnification in digital fluoroscopy.
    Rosenstein DS
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 1998; 39(4):304-8. PubMed ID: 9710131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Removal of image intensifier veiling glare by mathematical deconvolution techniques.
    Seibert JA; Nalcioglu O; Roeck W
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 4010632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The image intensifier in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
    Gans BJ; Kallal RH; Helgerson AC; Verona SR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1982 Nov; 40(11):726-9. PubMed ID: 6957560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of the X-ray system setting on patient dose and image quality; a case study with two interventional cardiology systems.
    Vassileva J; Vano E; Ubeda C; Rehani M; Zotova R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jul; 155(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 23396881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. 3-Dimensional rotational X-ray imaging, 3D-RX: image quality and patient dose simulation for optimisation studies.
    Kroon JN
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):341-9. PubMed ID: 15933134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Objective performance measurements versus perceived image quality in intensified fluoroscopic or photospot images.
    Gould RG; Belanger B; Goldberg HI; Moss A
    Radiology; 1980 Dec; 137(3):783-8. PubMed ID: 7444062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.