These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1422724)

  • 1. Comparative audit: an experimental study of 147,882 general surgical admissions during 1990.
    Dunn DC; Fowler S
    Br J Surg; 1992 Oct; 79(10):1073-6. PubMed ID: 1422724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Progress with cholecystectomy: improving results in England and Wales.
    Nair RG; Dunn DC; Fowler S; McCloy RF
    Br J Surg; 1997 Oct; 84(10):1396-8. PubMed ID: 9361597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a large teaching hospital: independent audit of the first 3 years.
    Steele RJ; Marshall K; Lang M; Doran J
    Br J Surg; 1995 Jul; 82(7):968-71. PubMed ID: 7648122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative audit of colorectal resection with the POSSUM scoring system.
    Sagar PM; Hartley MN; Mancey-Jones B; Sedman PC; May J; Macfie J
    Br J Surg; 1994 Oct; 81(10):1492-4. PubMed ID: 7820482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Presentation of comparative audit data.
    Murray GD; Hayes C; Fowler S; Dunn DC
    Br J Surg; 1995 Mar; 82(3):329-32. PubMed ID: 7796000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England and Wales: results of an audit by the Royal College of Surgeons of England.
    Dunn D; Nair R; Fowler S; McCloy R
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1994 Jul; 76(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 8074391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative audit: a new method of delivering audit.
    Emberton M; Rivett R; Ellis BW
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1991 Nov; 73(6 Suppl):117-20. PubMed ID: 1759780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of 30-day outcomes after emergency general surgery procedures: potential for targeted improvement.
    Ingraham AM; Cohen ME; Bilimoria KY; Raval MV; Ko CY; Nathens AB; Hall BL
    Surgery; 2010 Aug; 148(2):217-38. PubMed ID: 20633727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audit of open cholecystectomy in a district general hospital.
    Davies MG; O'Broin E; Mannion C; McGinley J; Gupta S; Shine MF; Lennon F
    Br J Surg; 1992 Apr; 79(4):314-6. PubMed ID: 1576496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A confidential comparative audit of stapedectomies: results of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Comparative Audit of ENT surgery 1994.
    Harkness P; Brown P; Fowler S; Grant H; Topham J
    J Laryngol Otol; 1995 Apr; 109(4):317-9. PubMed ID: 7782688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variations in colon and rectal surgical mortality. Comparison of specialties with a state-legislated database.
    Rosen L; Stasik JJ; Reed JF; Olenwine JA; Aronoff JS; Sherman D
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1996 Feb; 39(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 8620777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk-adjusted surgical audit with the POSSUM scoring system in a developing country. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity.
    Yii MK; Ng KJ
    Br J Surg; 2002 Jan; 89(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 11851674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Population-based audit of colorectal cancer management in two UK health regions. Colorectal Cancer Working Group, Royal College of Surgeons of England Clinical Epidemiology and Audit Unit.
    Mella J; Biffin A; Radcliffe AG; Stamatakis JD; Steele RJ
    Br J Surg; 1997 Dec; 84(12):1731-6. PubMed ID: 9448628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An audit of hospital mortality: general compared with vascular surgery.
    Browse DJ; Galland RB
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1991 Nov; 73(6 Suppl):121-43; discussion 123-4. PubMed ID: 1759781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Audit of major colorectal and biliary surgery to reduce rates of wound infection.
    Hancock BD
    BMJ; 1990 Oct; 301(6757):911-2. PubMed ID: 2261538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ENT day surgery in England and Wales--an audit by the Royal College of Surgeons (Eng.) Comparative Audit Service.
    Brown PM; Fowler S; Ryan R; Rivron R
    J Laryngol Otol; 1998 Feb; 112(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 9578876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system.
    Whiteley MS; Prytherch DR; Higgins B; Weaver PC; Prout WG
    Br J Surg; 1996 Jun; 83(6):812-5. PubMed ID: 8696749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implementation of a specialist-led service for the management of acute gallstone disease.
    Mercer SJ; Knight JS; Toh SK; Walters AM; Sadek SA; Somers SS
    Br J Surg; 2004 Apr; 91(4):504-8. PubMed ID: 15048757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Western Australian Audit of Surgical Mortality: advancing surgical accountability.
    Semmens JB; Aitken RJ; Sanfilippo FM; Mukhtar SA; Haynes NS; Mountain JA
    Med J Aust; 2005 Nov; 183(10):504-8. PubMed ID: 16296962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Open cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era.
    Jenkins PJ; Paterson HM; Parks RW; Garden OJ
    Br J Surg; 2007 Nov; 94(11):1382-5. PubMed ID: 17654611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.