146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1423197)
1. A comparative study of DNA ploidy in 115 fresh-frozen breast carcinomas by image analysis versus flow cytometry.
Ghali VS; Liau S; Teplitz C; Prudente R
Cancer; 1992 Dec; 70(11):2668-72. PubMed ID: 1423197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ploidy pattern and cell cycle in breast cancer as detected by image analysis and flow cytometry.
Luzi P; Bruni A; Mangiavacchi P; Cevenini G; Marini D; Tosi P
Cytometry; 1994 Jun; 18(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 7924702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative DNA analysis of solid tumors by flow cytometric and image analyses of touch imprints and flow cell suspensions.
Elsheikh TM; Silverman JF; McCool JW; Riley RS
Am J Clin Pathol; 1992 Sep; 98(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 1529964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative DNA analysis and proliferation in breast carcinomas. A comparison between image analysis and flow cytometry.
Lee AK; Wiley B; Dugan JM; Hamilton WH; Loda M; Heatley GJ; Cook L; Silverman ML
Pathol Res Pract; 1992 Jun; 188(4-5):428-32. PubMed ID: 1329051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative analysis of DNA content estimated by flow and image cytometry in breast tumor samples.
Jaszcz-Gruchała A; Swiatkiewicz I; Lackowska B; Gruchała A; Niezabitowski A
Pol J Pathol; 2001; 52(1-2):15-9. PubMed ID: 11505676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative DNA analysis in breast carcinomas: a comparison between image analysis and flow cytometry.
Lee AK; Dugan J; Hamilton WM; Cook L; Heatley G; Kamat B; Silverman ML
Mod Pathol; 1991 Mar; 4(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 2047381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative assessment of proliferation and DNA content in breast carcinoma by image analysis and flow cytometry.
Dawson AE; Norton JA; Weinberg DS
Am J Pathol; 1990 May; 136(5):1115-24. PubMed ID: 1972000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction by image and flow cytometry in breast cancer fine-needle cytopunctures.
Spyratos F; Briffod M
Mod Pathol; 1997 Jun; 10(6):556-63. PubMed ID: 9195572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of image analysis of imprints with flow cytometry for DNA analysis of solid tumors.
Claud RD; Weinstein RS; Howeedy A; Straus AK; Coon JS
Mod Pathol; 1989 Sep; 2(5):463-7. PubMed ID: 2813345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image analysis confirmation of DNA aneuploidy in flow cytometric DNA distributions having a wide coefficient of variation of the G0/G1 peak.
McFadden PW; Clowry LJ; Daehnert K; Hause LL; Koethe SM
Am J Clin Pathol; 1990 May; 93(5):637-42. PubMed ID: 2327365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a new slide-based laser scanning cytometer for DNA analysis of tumors. Comparison with flow cytometry and image analysis.
Martin-Reay DG; Kamentsky LA; Weinberg DS; Hollister KA; Cibas ES
Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Oct; 102(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 7942599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic significance of DNA image cytometry in Libyan breast cancer.
Ermiah E; Abdalla F; Buhmeida A; Alshrad M; Salem N; Pyrhönen S; Collan Y
Oncology; 2012; 83(3):165-76. PubMed ID: 22906963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of DNA quantitation in breast carcinoma with image cytometric analysis and in vitro fine-needle aspiration with flow cytometric analysis.
Lajoie G; Zbieranowski I; Demianiuk C; Knape WA; Edinger MG; Tubbs RR; Murray D
Am J Clin Pathol; 1993 Oct; 100(4):456-62. PubMed ID: 8213641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interlaboratory reproducibility of semiautomated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometry DNA-histograms obtained from fresh material of 1,295 breast cancer cases.
Bergers E; Montironi R; van Diest PJ; Prete E; Baak JP
Hum Pathol; 1996 Jun; 27(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 8666364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DNA ploidy in breast lesions. A comparative study using two commercial image analysis systems and flow cytometry.
Wilbur DC; Zakowski MF; Kosciol CM; Sojda DF; Pastuszak WT
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1990 Feb; 12(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 2302308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DNA ploidy by image cytometry in urothelial carcinomas. Comparison of touch imprints and paraffin-embedded biopsies from 31 patients.
Mainguené C; Choquenet C; Deplano C; Gavelli A; Clément N; Vanzo E; Hofman P
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1997 Oct; 19(5):437-42. PubMed ID: 9349904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of flow and image cytometry for DNA content analysis of fresh and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue in breast carcinoma.
Chen TL; Luo I; Mikhail N; Rasková J; Raska K
Cytometry; 1995 Sep; 22(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 8556949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [DNA cytometry using paraffin embedded tumor tissues. Comparison of flow cytometry (FCM) and image cytometry (ICM)].
Baretton G; Blasenbreu S; Li X; DePascale T; Löhrs U
Zentralbl Pathol; 1994 Feb; 139(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 7512820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic value of S-phase fraction in lymph-node-negative breast cancer by image and flow cytometric analysis.
Peiró G; Lerma E; Climent MA; Seguí MA; Alonso MC; Prat J
Mod Pathol; 1997 Mar; 10(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 9071729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative DNA analysis of fresh solid tumors by flow and image cytometric methods: a comparison using the Roche Pathology Workstation Image Analyzer.
Ellison DA; Maygarden SJ; Novotny DB
Mod Pathol; 1995 Apr; 8(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 7617654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
