These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. A comparative trial of telepaque and biloptin. MANTON DJ Br J Radiol; 1961 May; 34():298-301. PubMed ID: 13766333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [EXPERIENCES IN ORAL CHOLECYSTOCHOLANGIOGRAPHY WITH OSBIL AS GALLBLADDER CONTRAST MEDIUM AND EGG-YOLK-SORBITOL TABLETS (CM TABLETS0 AS CONTRACTION MEDIUM]. HEIDE M Med Klin; 1965 Jun; 60():996-7. PubMed ID: 14306881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Oragrafin, a new cholecystographic medium: a double-blind comparison with Telepaque. JUHL JH; COOPERMAN LR; CRUMMY AB Radiology; 1963 Jan; 80():87-91. PubMed ID: 13957983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fractionated dose cholecystography: a comparison between iopanoic acid and sodium ipodate. Reiner RG; Lawson MJ; Davies GT; Tucker WG; Mileski O; Read TR; Grant AK Clin Radiol; 1980 Nov; 31(6):667-9. PubMed ID: 7214807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [OSBIL: A NEW CONTRAST MEDIUM FOR ORAL CHOLECYSTOGRAPHY]. EGEBLAD M Nord Med; 1963 Aug; 70():914-5. PubMed ID: 14045699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Experience with Osbil, a contrast medium for oral cholecystography]. GIMES B Orv Hetil; 1962 Feb; 103():268-9. PubMed ID: 13898724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative trial of three oral cholecystographic contrast media--iocetamic acid, iopanoic acid and sodium ipodate. Cargill A; Hately W Br J Radiol; 1981 Jan; 54(637):79-80. PubMed ID: 6449974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE NEPHROTOXIC EFFECTS OF ORAL CHOLECYSTOGRAPHIC AGENTS. FINK HE; ROENIGK WJ; WILSON GP Am J Med Sci; 1964 Feb; 247():201-16. PubMed ID: 14124710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [CHOLECYSTOGRAPHY WITH OSBIL]. MILITEANU Z Harefuah; 1964 Sep; 67():204-6. PubMed ID: 14199859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [A NEW CONTRAST MEDIUM FOR CHOLECYSTOGRAPHY: OSBIL]. SCHIFINO A; VECCHIO C Minerva Radiol Fisioter Radiobiol; 1964; 16():329-33. PubMed ID: 14187600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Experience with Osbil, a new oral biliary contrast medium]. FLEISCHMANN E; WANEK G Wien Med Wochenschr; 1962 Feb; 112():146-7. PubMed ID: 13893507 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. ORAGRAFIN AS A SUPPLEMENTAL CONTRAST AGENT IN ORAL CHOLECYSTOGRAPHY. RICHARDSON GA; SCHREIBER MH Tex State J Med; 1963 Aug; 59():788-9. PubMed ID: 14044597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Double blind clinical comparison of two oral cholecystographic contrast media. Perez CA; Friedenberg MJ Mo Med; 1966 Jan; 63(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 5329730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. CLINICAL COMPARISON OF THREE CHOLECYSTOGRAPHIC MEDIA. HURLEY DJ; FEORE DR J Can Assoc Radiol; 1963 Dec; 14():187-90. PubMed ID: 14086129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Osbil, a new oralbile contrast medium]. SCHLAGER K; SCHUSTER H Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1962 Jan; 74():28-9. PubMed ID: 14498496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]