These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Does cerebral dominance offer a sufficient explanation for laterality differences in tachistoscopic recognition? White MJ Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Apr; 36(2):479-85. PubMed ID: 4690737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Lateral dominance in tachistoscopic word recognition performances obtained with simultaneous bilateral input. McKeever WF; Hulling MD Neuropsychologia; 1971 Mar; 9(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 4336397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Tachistoscopic recognition of line orientation. Sasanuma S; Kobayashi Y Neuropsychologia; 1978; 16(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 692850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Visual perception in normal children and adults II. Correlation between dominance of visual field and dominance of the eye]. Ichiba N No To Hattatsu; 1989 May; 21(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 2736125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bilateral tachistoscopic word perception in aphasic and normal subjects. Moore WH; Weidner WE Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Oct; 39(2):1003-11. PubMed ID: 4453482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Bilateral tachistoscopic recognitions of verbal and nonverbal stimuli. Hines D Cortex; 1972 Sep; 8(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 4637926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Integration of post-exposural directional scanning and cerebral dominance explanations of lateral differences in trachistoscopic recognition. Fudin R; Masterson CC Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Apr; 42(2):355-9. PubMed ID: 1272678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tachistoscopic word recognition performance under conditions of simultaneous bilateral presentation. Mackavey W; Curcio F; Rosen J Neuropsychologia; 1975 Jan; 13(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 1109458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Does post-exposural directional scanning offer a sufficient explanation for lateral differences in tachistoscopic recognition? McKeever WF Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Feb; 38(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 4815516 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bilateral tachistoscopic perception, handedness, and laterality. II. Nonverbal stimuli. Schmuller J; Goodman R Brain Lang; 1980 Sep; 11(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 7427713 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Dominance of a hemisphere and optical perception with tachistoscope examination]. Deegener G Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1974 Apr; 26(4):193-201. PubMed ID: 4848523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Right visual field superiority for letter recognition with partial report. Hirata K; Bryden MP Can J Psychol; 1976 Sep; 30(3):134-9. PubMed ID: 1000405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]