These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Retinal and assumed size cues as determinants of size and distance perception. BAIRD JC J Exp Psychol; 1963 Aug; 66():155-62. PubMed ID: 13969069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. SOME CONDITIONS OF THE EFFECT OF RELATIVE SIZE ON PERCEIVED RELATIVE DISTANCE. EPSTEIN W; FRANKLIN S Am J Psychol; 1965 Sep; 78():466-70. PubMed ID: 14344090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. THE SIZE CUE TO VISUALLY PERCEIVED DISTANCE. AM 64-13. GOGEL WC Rep Civ Aeromed Res Inst US; 1964 Jan; ():1-25. PubMed ID: 14293289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. EFFECT OF REDUCTION ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN APPARENT SIZE AND DISTANCE. HARTMAN AM Am J Psychol; 1964 Sep; 77():353-66. PubMed ID: 14198667 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Relative height and relative size as monocular depth cues in the trapezoid. Dunn BE; Thomas SW Percept Mot Skills; 1966 Feb; 22(1):275-81. PubMed ID: 5906730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. THE BEHAVIOURAL BASIS OF PERCEIVED SIZE AND DISTANCE. TAYLOR JG Can J Psychol; 1965 Mar; 19():1-14. PubMed ID: 14304086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. SIZE OF RETINAL IMAGE AS A PERCEPTUAL CUE. BAIRD JC Percept Mot Skills; 1964 Apr; 18():529-32. PubMed ID: 14166052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Familial and assumed size as signal of distance and depth perception]. Bredenkamp J Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1984; 136(2):89-105. PubMed ID: 6517682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. ACCOMMODATION AS A DISTANCE-CUE. WALLACH H; NORRIS CM Am J Psychol; 1963 Dec; 76():659-64. PubMed ID: 14082663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. THE VISUAL PERCEPTION OF SPATIAL EXTENT. REP 63-20. GOGEL WC Rep Civ Aeromed Res Inst US; 1963 Sep; ():1-11. PubMed ID: 14133532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of pictorial depth information on projected size judgments. Farran EK; Whitaker A; Patel N Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 19304611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Depth perception in Pandora's box and size illusion: evolution with age. Chevrier J; Delorme A Perception; 1983; 12(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 6657424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pictorial depth and related constancy effects as a function of recognition. Rock I; Shallo J; Schwartz F Perception; 1978; 7(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 628579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison between illumination and position pictorial depth cues. Murphy K; McConathy D J Biocommun; 1987; 14(2):19-26. PubMed ID: 3611048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Further consideration of size illusions in random dot stereograms. Greene E; Gentner S Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Aug; 93(1):205-12. PubMed ID: 11693687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of familiar size at familiar distances. Fitzpatrick V; Pasnak R; Tyer ZE Perception; 1982; 11(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 7133938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recalibration by pairing: a process of perceptual learning. Epstein W Perception; 1975; 4(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 1161441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]