These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14241093)

  • 1. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION IN THE ABSENCE OF DISCRIMINATION FACTORS.
    TOSTI DT; ELLIS HC
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Dec; 68():595-8. PubMed ID: 14241093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION OF A POSITIVE CONDITIONED REINFORCER. II. EFFECTS OF DISCRIMINATION TRAINING.
    THOMAS DR; CARONITE SC
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Oct; 68():402-6. PubMed ID: 14216499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of interdimensional training on stimulus generalization.
    Switalski RW; Lyons J; Thomas DR
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Nov; 72(5):661-6. PubMed ID: 5972005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual difference as a factor influencing generalization slope and discrimination learning.
    Hansen G; Miller JT; Thomas DR
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1971 Dec; 77(3):456-62. PubMed ID: 5118254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of different measures of response strength in the study of stimulus generalization.
    Thomas DR; Konick DS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1966 May; 9(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 5948922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. OPERANT DISCRIMINATION LEARNING AND STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AS A FUNCTION OF REWARD EXPOSURE.
    DICKSON JF; THOMAS DR
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1963 Oct; 56():829-33. PubMed ID: 14050168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PRIMARY STIMULUS GENERALIZATION UNDER DIFFERENT PERCENTAGES OF REINFORCEMENT IN EYELID CONDITIONING.
    VANDAMENT WE; PRICE LE
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Feb; 67():162-7. PubMed ID: 14114914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual differences in the severely retarded child in acquisition, stimulus generalization, and extinction in go-no-go discrimination learning.
    Evans PL; Hogg JH
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1975 Dec; 20(3):377-90. PubMed ID: 1206354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION ALONG THE DIMENSION OF ANGULARITY: A COMPARISON OF TRAINING PROCEDURES.
    NEWMAN FL; BARON MR
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1965 Aug; 60():59-63. PubMed ID: 14334244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A DISCRIMINATED-OPERANT BASELINE PROCEDURE FOR ANALYSIS OF STIMULUS GENERALIZATION IN INDIVIDUALS.
    ORLANDO R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1965 Feb; 20():247-54. PubMed ID: 14286529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. GENERALIZED PARTIAL REINFORCEMENT EFFECT.
    BROWN RT; LOGAN FA
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1965 Aug; 60():64-9. PubMed ID: 14334245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transfer from classical conditioning and extinction to acquisition, extinction, and stimulus generalization of a positively reinforced instrumental response.
    Trapold MA; Winokur S
    J Exp Psychol; 1967 Apr; 73(4):517-25. PubMed ID: 6068033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus generalization of a positive conditioned reinforcer. 3. The new learning method.
    Caronite SC; Thomas DR
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Mar; 71(3):385-8. PubMed ID: 5908820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence for positive induction in discrimination learning.
    Senf GM; Miller NE
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1967 Aug; 64(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 6064414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stimulus generalization of a positive conditioned reinforcer. IV. Concurrent generalization of reinforcing and discriminative stimulus functions following fixed-interval training.
    Thomas DR; DeRosa DV
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Aug; 72(2):260-2. PubMed ID: 5968286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION ALONG A LIGHT FLICKER RATE CONTINUUM AFTER DISCRIMINATION TRAINING WITH SEVERAL S-'S.
    SLOANE HN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 May; 7(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 14143907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response patterning during stimulus generalization in the rat.
    Crites RJ; Harris RT; Rosenquist H; Thomas DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Mar; 10(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 6032521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FORCE GRADIENTS IN STIMULUS GENERALIZATION.
    COLE JL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1965 Jul; 8(4):231-41. PubMed ID: 14342030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus generalization within the limbic system.
    Stutz RM
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1968 Feb; 65(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 5648468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus control, cue utilization, and attention: effects of discrimination training.
    Newman FL; Benefield RL
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1968 Aug; 66(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 5672612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.