These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14241096)

  • 1. SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT IN CHILDREN AS A FUNCTION OF CONDITIONING ASSOCIATIONS AND EXTINCTION PERCENTAGES.
    MYERS JL; MYERS NA
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Dec; 68():611-2. PubMed ID: 14241096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Secondary reinforcement in children as a function of conditioning associations, extinction percentages, and stimulus types.
    MYERS JL; MYERS NA
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 May; 65():455-9. PubMed ID: 13936959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frustration and secondary reinforcement concepts as applied to human instrumental conditioning and extinction.
    Longstreth LE
    Psychol Monogr; 1966; 80(11):1-29. PubMed ID: 5970214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SELECTIVE LEARNING IN SEVERELY RETARDED CHILDREN AS A FUNCTION OF DIFFERENTIAL REACTION TO NONREWARD.
    SEMLER IJ
    Child Dev; 1965 Mar; 36():143-52. PubMed ID: 14296783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. RESPONSE FORCE AS A FUNCTION OF AMOUNT OF REINFORCEMENT.
    DILOLLO V; ENSMINGER WD; NOTTERMAN JM
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jul; 70():27-31. PubMed ID: 14315127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CUE AND SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT EFFECTS WITH CHILDREN.
    SIDOWSKI JB; KASS N; WILSON H
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Apr; 69():340-2. PubMed ID: 14286301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extinction and disinhibition as a function of reinforcement schedule with severely retarded children.
    Baumeister AA; Hawkins WF
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1966 Jul; 3(4):343-7. PubMed ID: 5961516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Resistance to extinction as a function of incentive, percentage of reinforcement, and number of nonreinforced trials.
    Uhl CN; Young AG
    J Exp Psychol; 1967 Apr; 73(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 6034010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discrete-trials lever pressing in the rat as a function of pattern of reinforcement, effortfulness of response, and amount of reward.
    Gonzalez RC; Bainbridge P; Bitterman ME
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1966 Feb; 61(1):110-22. PubMed ID: 5903265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acquisition and extinction under single alternation and random partial-reinforcement conditions with a 24-hour intertrial interval.
    Surridge CT; Amsel A
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Sep; 72(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 5968682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DIFFERENTIAL CONDITIONING, EXTINCTION, AND SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT.
    BLACK RW
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jan; 69():67-74. PubMed ID: 14256251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Resistance to extinction of the continuously rewarded response in within-subject partial-reinforcement experiments.
    Rashotte ME
    J Exp Psychol; 1968 Feb; 76(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 5636561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of intertrial reinforcement on resistance to extinction following extended training.
    Black RW; Spence KW
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Dec; 70(6):559-63. PubMed ID: 5839508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aftereffects and delay of reward.
    Capaldi EJ; Poynor H
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Jan; 71(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 5902146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resistance to extinction as a function of percentage of reinforcement, number of training trials, and conditioned reinforcement.
    Kass N; Wilson H
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Mar; 71(3):355-7. PubMed ID: 5908814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Percentage of reinforcement and reward magnitude effects in a T MAZE: between and within subjects.
    Spear NE; Pavlik WB
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Apr; 71(4):521-8. PubMed ID: 5909077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CONTRAST EFFECTS IN EXTINCTION RESPONDING AS A FUNCTION OF RESPONSE EFFORT DURING CONDITIONING.
    STACHNIK T
    J Psychol; 1965 Jul; 60():199-203. PubMed ID: 14326186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Force-contingent reinforcement in instrumental conditioning and extinction in children: a test of the frustration-drive hypothesis.
    Blixt S; Ley R
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1969 Oct; 69(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 5404457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of number and percentage of rewarded trials on the acquisition and extinction of lever pressing using a discrete-trial procedure.
    Porter JJ; Hug JJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Dec; 70(6):575-9. PubMed ID: 5839510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frustration considerations of the small-trials partial reinforcement effect: experience with nonreward and intertrial reinforcement.
    Brooks CI
    J Exp Psychol; 1971 Aug; 89(2):362-71. PubMed ID: 5567141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.