These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. RELATION BETWEEN BARRIER SCORES AND AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR. MEGARGEE EI J Abnorm Psychol; 1965 Aug; 70():307-11. PubMed ID: 14341716 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL INVESTIGATION OF COLOR ON THE HOLTZMAN. VANDECASTLE RL; SPICHER RS J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1964 Dec; 28():491-8. PubMed ID: 14242372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. INKBLOT PERCEPTION AND THE PROCESS-REACTIVE DISTINCTION. ULLMANN LP; ECK RA J Clin Psychol; 1965 Jul; 21():311-3. PubMed ID: 14332204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. CHANGES IN INKBLOT PERCEPTION WITH PRESENTATION OF THE HOLTZMAN INKBLOT TECHNIQUE AS AN "INTELLIGENCE TEST". HERRON EW J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1964 Dec; 28():442-7. PubMed ID: 14242367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. FACTOR ANALYSIS OF OBJECTIVE INK BLOT TEST SCORES. BRIDGES CC Percept Mot Skills; 1964 Apr; 18():489-92. PubMed ID: 14166043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. THE RORSCHACH AND HOLTZMAN AS MEASURES OF PATHOGNOMIC VERBALIZATION. WHITAKER L J Consult Psychol; 1965 Apr; 29():181-3. PubMed ID: 14282429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Individual differences in somatic perception. A projective method of investigation. Cassell WA Adv Psychosom Med; 1972; 8():86-104. PubMed ID: 4576879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Tester bias and response to projective instruments. Marwit SJ; Marcia JE J Consult Psychol; 1967 Jun; 31(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 4859930 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Inkblot perception and personality: the meaning of inkblot variables. HOLTZMAN WH Bull Menninger Clin; 1963 Mar; 27():84-95. PubMed ID: 13961486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. PERSONALITY-PERCEPTION: CHARACTERISTIC RESPONSE TO AVAILABLE PART-CUES. KEMPLER B; WIENER M J Pers; 1964 Mar; 32():57-74. PubMed ID: 14132507 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. PERFORMANCE OF HIGH-AND LOW-ANXIOUS CHILDREN ON THE HOLTZMAN INKBLOT TECHNIQUE. SWARTZ JD Child Dev; 1965 Jun; 36():569-75. PubMed ID: 14300876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. ADAPTATION TO INKBLOT STIMULI: EFFECTS OF ORDER OF PRESENTATION, CONTEXT AND STIMULI CHARACTERISTICS. BLOCK WE; GREENFIELD L J Clin Psychol; 1965 Jul; 21():301-4. PubMed ID: 14332201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The ink blot test as a brief projective technique: a preliminary report. DORKEN H Am J Orthopsychiatry; 1950 Oct; 20(4):828-33. PubMed ID: 14789971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Principles underlying the projective technics of personality measurement. PIOTROWSKI ZA Arch Neurol Psychiatry; 1950 Sep; 64(3):478-9. PubMed ID: 15433660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]