186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1424467)
1. Medical records figure prominently in malpractice cases. A closed liability claims analysis.
Richards BC; Thomasson GO
Colo Med; 1992 Nov; 89(11):398-401. PubMed ID: 1424467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical liability and neurologically impaired infants: a special approach to handling claims.
Uehlin TL
J Med Assoc Ga; 1990 Mar; 79(3):171-3. PubMed ID: 2319221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Closed liability claims analysis and the medical record.
Richards BC; Thomasson G
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):313-6. PubMed ID: 1635752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Malpractice rates. How high now.
Rice B
Med Econ; 2004 Jan; 81(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 14959605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical liability reform crisis 2008.
Weinstein SL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Feb; 467(2):392-401. PubMed ID: 18989732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Malpractice risk the same for female and male ob/gyns.
Koska MT
Hospitals; 1992 Dec; 66(23):50. PubMed ID: 1446913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk management and the claims process.
Savage M
N Y State Dent J; 1998 May; 64(5):30-3. PubMed ID: 9642983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An analysis of closed obstetric malpractice claims.
Rosenblatt RA; Hurst A
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Nov; 74(5):710-4. PubMed ID: 2812646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perinatal medical negligence closed claims from the St. Paul Company, 1980-1982.
Ogburn PL; Julian TM; Brooker DC; Joseph MS; Butler JC; Williams PP; Anderson ML; Shepard AC; Ogburn SL; Preisler WC
J Reprod Med; 1988 Jul; 33(7):608-11. PubMed ID: 3172061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Neglect in obstetrics: high indemnities are threatening in cases of gross carelessness].
Molkentin T
Pflege Z; 1998 Oct; 51(10):752-5. PubMed ID: 10026568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Colorado obstetrical care malpractice study report.
Calonge N
Colo Med; 1988 Feb; 85(4):63-5. PubMed ID: 3349746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Professional liability payments in obstetrics and gynecology.
Barbieri RL
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 107(3):578-81. PubMed ID: 16507927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Professional liability insurance: still a crisis.
Queenan JT
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 105(6):1285-6. PubMed ID: 15932818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Malpractice crisis: causes of escalating insurance premiums, and implications for you.
Henley E
J Fam Pract; 2006 Aug; 55(8):703-6. PubMed ID: 16882444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Time for the CMPA to reward malpractice-free MDs?
Dattani ID
CMAJ; 1997 Mar; 156(6):761, 764. PubMed ID: 9084375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The risks of being sued and how much is paid.
West RW; Sipe CY
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Feb; 1(2):89-91. PubMed ID: 17411532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Closed claim review from a single carrier in New York: the real costs of malpractice in surgery and factors that determine outcomes.
Zenilman JC; Haskel MA; McCabe J; Zenilman ME
Am J Surg; 2012 Jun; 203(6):733-40. PubMed ID: 22643038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Presidential address: medical-legal issues in obstetrics and gynecology.
Laros RK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 192(6):1883-9. PubMed ID: 15970843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The malpractice premium costs of obstetrics.
Norton SA
Inquiry; 1997; 34(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 9146508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Malpractice aside, OBGs are doing very well.
Paxton HT
Med Econ; 1988 Jun; 65(12):62-4, 66-7, 70-9. PubMed ID: 10287960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
