114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1424589)
1. Electrical impedance applied to non-invasive detection of irritation in skin.
Ollmar S; Emtestam L
Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Jul; 27(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 1424589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrical impedance index in human skin: measurements after occlusion, in 5 anatomical regions and in mild irritant contact dermatitis.
Emtestam L; Ollmar S
Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Feb; 28(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 8458202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrical impedance compared with other non-invasive bioengineering techniques and visual scoring for detection of irritation in human skin.
Ollmar S; Nyrén M; Nicander I; Emtestam L
Br J Dermatol; 1994 Jan; 130(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 8305313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrical impedance measured to five skin depths in mild irritant dermatitis induced by sodium lauryl sulphate.
Nicander I; Ollmar S; Rozell BL; Eek A; Emtestam L
Br J Dermatol; 1995 May; 132(5):718-24. PubMed ID: 7772476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of irritant skin reactions using electrical impedance--a comparison between 2 laboratories.
Kuzmina N; Duval C; Johnsson S; Boman A; Lindberg M; Emtestam L
Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Jul; 49(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 14641117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of acute skin irritation in rabbits using electrical impedance model.
Ferreira DM; Silva CS; Souza MN
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1665-8. PubMed ID: 17945658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrical impedance for estimation of irritation in oral mucosa and skin.
Ollmar S; Eek A; Sundström F; Emtestam L
Med Prog Technol; 1995; 21(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 7791690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acute irritant reactivity to sodium lauryl sulfate in atopics and non-atopics.
Basketter DA; Miettinen J; Lahti A
Contact Dermatitis; 1998 May; 38(5):253-7. PubMed ID: 9667441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surfactant-induced skin irritation and skin repair: evaluation of a cumulative human irritation model by noninvasive techniques.
Wilhelm KP; Freitag G; Wolff HH
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1994 Dec; 31(6):981-7. PubMed ID: 7962781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of patch test size and design on the distribution of erythema induced by sodium lauryl sulfate.
Nicholson M; Willis CM
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Nov; 41(5):264-7. PubMed ID: 10554060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monitoring of skin response to sodium lauryl sulphate: clinical scores versus bioengineering methods.
van Neste D; de Brouwer B
Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Sep; 27(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 1451459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tandem repeated application of organic solvents and sodium lauryl sulphate enhances cumulative skin irritation.
Schliemann S; Schmidt C; Elsner P
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2014; 27(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 24457469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The tandem repeated irritation test: a new method to assess prevention of irritant combination damage to the skin.
Wigger-Alberti W; Spoo J; Schliemann-Willers S; Klotz A; Elsner P
Acta Derm Venereol; 2002; 82(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 12125960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intra-individual variation of irritant threshold and relationship to transepidermal water loss measurement of skin irritation.
Smith HR; Rowson M; Basketter DA; McFadden JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 15291829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrical impedance model for evaluation of skin irritation in rabbits and humans.
Ferreira DM; Silva CS; Souza MN
Skin Res Technol; 2007 Aug; 13(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 17610647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the course of the irritant reaction after irritation with sodium lauryl sulphate.
Gloor M; Senger B; Langenauer M; Fluhr JW
Skin Res Technol; 2004 Aug; 10(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 15225263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of different concentrations of betaine as a reducing irritation agent in soaps monitored visually and non-invasively.
Nicander I; Aberg P; Ollmar S
Skin Res Technol; 2003 Feb; 9(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 12535284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of skin irritancy of sodium lauryl sulphate: a comparative study between the replica method and visual evaluation.
Kawai K; Nakagawa M; Kawai J; Kawai K
Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Sep; 27(3):174-81. PubMed ID: 1451463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrical impedance as a potential tool to distinguish between allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.
Nyrén M; Kuzmina N; Emtestam L
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2003 Mar; 48(3):394-400. PubMed ID: 12637919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The sodium lauryl sulfate model: an overview.
Lee CH; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Jul; 33(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 7493454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
