These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1424615)

  • 1. Abortion 1992: the boundaries of regulation.
    Healey JM
    Conn Med; 1992 Sep; 56(9):503. PubMed ID: 1424615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation.
    Moses MF
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
    Borgmann CE
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test.
    Burdick R
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abortion-rights groups look to 1998.
    Serafini MW
    Natl J (Wash); 1998 Jan; 30(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 10176714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Banning partial-birth abortion: drafting a constitutionally acceptable statute.
    Gough AD
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2000 Aug; (257):9-36. PubMed ID: 11066592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion providers bounce back.
    Carney EN
    Natl J (Wash); 1996 Jul; 28(29-30):1584-6. PubMed ID: 10159048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Court stands by abortion.
    Press A; Camper D
    Newsweek; 1983 Jun; 101(26):62-3. PubMed ID: 10260662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
    Weitz TA; Yanow S
    Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Supreme Court affirms abortion rights; allows most state limits.
    Hosp Ethics; 1992; 8(5):15-6. PubMed ID: 10120134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The abortion issue in the US.
    Fabrizio T
    Nord Med; 1990; 105(3):93-4. PubMed ID: 2320407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Under the radar.
    Tumulty K; Novak V
    Time; 2003 Jan; 161(4):38-41. PubMed ID: 12577595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perspectives. Abortion after Webster.
    Olson EG
    Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1989 Jul; 43(28):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10294036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Employe must complain to EEOC before feds force abortion payment.
    Geisel J
    Mod Healthc; 1980 Mar; 10(3):34. PubMed ID: 10245570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The argument that never ends.
    Simon R
    US News World Rep; 2003 Jan; 134(2):24. PubMed ID: 12561696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choice and the post-Roe generation.
    Morse J
    Time; 2003 Jan; 161(4):40-1. PubMed ID: 12577596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Four-one-four.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(5):27-9. PubMed ID: 2793440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The validity of legislative restrictions on abortion under the Oregon constitution.
    Tweedt DE
    Temple Law Rev; 1992; 65(4):1349-71. PubMed ID: 16047444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Symposium: A Celebration of Reproductive Rights: Twenty-Five Years of Roe v. Wade.
    Perry T; Garcia MT; Baird B; Frietsche S
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 15871152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.