81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1425129)
21. The response to visual form deprivation differs with age in marmosets.
Troilo D; Nickla DL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 46(6):1873-81. PubMed ID: 15914598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry.
Santodomingo-Rubido J; Mallen EA; Gilmartin B; Wolffsohn JS
Br J Ophthalmol; 2002 Apr; 86(4):458-62. PubMed ID: 11914218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical and laboratory investigations of the relationship of accommodation and convergence function with refractive error. A literature review.
Goss DA; Zhai H
Doc Ophthalmol; 1994; 86(4):349-80. PubMed ID: 7835174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biofeedback of accommodation to reduce myopia: a review.
Trachtman JN
Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1987 Aug; 64(8):639-43. PubMed ID: 3310647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Microspherophakia.
Chan RT; Collin HB
Clin Exp Optom; 2002 Sep; 85(5):294-9. PubMed ID: 12366350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Steady-state accommodation and ocular biometry in late-onset myopia.
Bullimore MA; Gilmartin B; Royston JM
Doc Ophthalmol; 1992; 80(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 1425129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of accommodative adaptation on static and dynamic accommodation in emmetropia and late-onset myopia.
Jiang BC; White JM
Optom Vis Sci; 1999 May; 76(5):295-302. PubMed ID: 10375245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ocular components measured by keratometry, phakometry, and ultrasonography in emmetropic and myopic optometry students.
Goss DA; Van Veen HG; Rainey BB; Feng B
Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jul; 74(7):489-95. PubMed ID: 9293515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accommodation-induced intraocular pressure changes in progressing myopes and emmetropes.
Yan L; Huibin L; Xuemin L
Eye (Lond); 2014 Nov; 28(11):1334-40. PubMed ID: 25190534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of refractive error on the accommodative response gradient.
McBrien NA; Millodot M
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1986; 6(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 3748560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dynamic accommodation and myopia.
Culhane HM; Winn B
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 40(9):1968-74. PubMed ID: 10440250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. ACCOMMODATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF A GROUP OF MYOPIC ADULTS.
BALDWIN WR
Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom; 1965 Apr; 42():237-43. PubMed ID: 14316766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. On emmetropia and ametropia.
van ALPHEN G
Opt Acta (Lond); 1961; 142(Suppl)():1-92. PubMed ID: 13860704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence.
FINCHAM EF; WALTON J
J Physiol; 1957 Aug; 137(3):488-508. PubMed ID: 13463783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The influence of visual acuity on accommodative responses of the eye.
HEATH GG
Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom; 1956 Oct; 33(10):513-24. PubMed ID: 13362462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Differences among myopes, emmetropes, and hyperopes.
Gawron VJ
Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1981 Sep; 58(9):753-60. PubMed ID: 7294147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
