These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1425129)

  • 61. Disparity-induced accommodation in late-onset myopia.
    Rosenfield M; Gilmartin B
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(3):353-5. PubMed ID: 3269515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The effect of refractive error on the accommodative response gradient: a summary and update.
    Millodot M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Nov; 35(6):607-12. PubMed ID: 26336942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Effect of simplified and traditional Chinese character on accommodative microfluctuation in young adult myopes and emmetropes].
    Xin W; Shen PC; Zheng CC; Liu Y; Xu D
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 54(4):288-293. PubMed ID: 29747359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Near work-induced transient myopia in Indian subjects.
    Sivaraman V; Rizwana JH; Ramani K; Price H; Calver R; Pardhan S; Vasudevan B; Allen PM
    Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Nov; 98(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 26497844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Corneal and crystalline lens dimensions before and after myopia onset.
    Mutti DO; Mitchell GL; Sinnott LT; Jones-Jordan LA; Moeschberger ML; Cotter SA; Kleinstein RN; Manny RE; Twelker JD; Zadnik K;
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Mar; 89(3):251-62. PubMed ID: 22227914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Experimental myopia in a diurnal mammal (Sciurus carolinensis) with no accommodative ability.
    McBrien NA; Moghaddam HO; New R; Williams LR
    J Physiol; 1993 Sep; 469():427-41. PubMed ID: 8271206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Accommodative response to peripheral stimuli in myopes and emmetropes.
    Hartwig A; Charman WN; Radhakrishnan H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2011 Jan; 31(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 21054470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Accommodation, pupil diameter and myopia.
    Charman WN; Radhakrishnan H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Jan; 29(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 19154283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Anterior movement of the crystalline lens in the process of accommodation in children.
    Kaluzny BJ
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007; 17(4):515-20. PubMed ID: 17671924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Refractive group differences in accommodation microfluctuations with changing accommodation stimulus.
    Day M; Strang NC; Seidel D; Gray LS; Mallen EA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jan; 26(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 16390487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Does transient increase in axial length during accommodation attenuate with age?
    Laughton DS; Sheppard AL; Mallen EAH; Read SA; Davies LN
    Clin Exp Optom; 2017 Nov; 100(6):676-682. PubMed ID: 28294406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. A longitudinal study of accommodative changes in biometry during incipient presbyopia.
    Laughton DS; Sheppard AL; Davies LN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jan; 36(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 26432063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Assessment of the CA/C ratio in a myopic population.
    Rosenfield M; Gilmartin B
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Mar; 65(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 3364525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. The relationship between refractive and biometric changes during Edinger-Westphal stimulated accommodation in rhesus monkeys.
    Vilupuru AS; Glasser A
    Exp Eye Res; 2005 Mar; 80(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 15721617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Changes in equivalent and gradient refractive index of the crystalline lens with accommodation.
    Garner LF; Smith G
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 74(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 9097329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Comparison of torsional amplitudes between emmetropes and myopes using after-image slides.
    Baskaran AA; Britto T; Rajkumar S; Thomas PA; Jesudasan CAN
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 67(5):655-658. PubMed ID: 31007232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Myopes Show Greater Visually Induced Postural Responses Than Emmetropes.
    Sayah DN; Asaad K; Hanssens JM; Giraudet G; Faubert J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Feb; 57(2):551-6. PubMed ID: 26873515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Comparison of ocular component growth curves among refractive error groups in children.
    Jones LA; Mitchell GL; Mutti DO; Hayes JR; Moeschberger ML; Zadnik K
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2317-27. PubMed ID: 15980217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Accommodation, accommodative convergence, and response AC/A ratios before and at the onset of myopia in children.
    Gwiazda J; Thorn F; Held R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Apr; 82(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 15829855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Effect of blur adaptation on blur sensitivity and discrimination in emmetropes and myopes.
    Cufflin MP; Mankowska A; Mallen EA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jun; 48(6):2932-9. PubMed ID: 17525230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.