These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14251358)

  • 1. DISCRIMINATION OF FORM ORIENTATION IN YOUNG CHILDREN.
    WOHLWILL JF; WIENER M
    Child Dev; 1964 Dec; 35():1113-25. PubMed ID: 14251358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discrimination of mirror-image shapes by young children.
    Thompson GB
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1975 Feb; 19(1):165-76. PubMed ID: 1117251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Construction of the horizontal, vertical, and oblique by young children: failure to find the "oblique effect".
    Berman PW; Cunningham JG; Harkulich J
    Child Dev; 1974 Jun; 45(2):474-8. PubMed ID: 4837719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why do children reverse letters?
    Frith U
    Br J Psychol; 1971 Nov; 62(4):459-68. PubMed ID: 5121637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orientation and position effects of mirror-image reversal discrimination of triangles by young children.
    Cronin V
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Jun; 34(3):707-11. PubMed ID: 5040480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DEVELOPMENTAL CHANGES IN THE LOCATION OF FORM DISCRIMINATION CUES.
    KERPELMAN LC; POLLACK RH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1964 Oct; 19():375-82. PubMed ID: 14214699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Object and pattern discrimination learning by young children as a function of availability of cues.
    Falk CT
    Child Dev; 1968 Sep; 39(3):923-31. PubMed ID: 5687337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of between-trials variability and initial response outcome on the alternation discrimination learning of retarded adolescents.
    Clinton L
    Am J Ment Defic; 1972 Jan; 76(4):440-5. PubMed ID: 5060206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are differential orienting responses necessary for dimensional learning and transfer?
    Shepp BE; Howard DV
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Sep; 100(1):122-34. PubMed ID: 4744488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Children's categorical representation of oblique orientation.
    Scher A; Olson DR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Apr; 54(2):543-7. PubMed ID: 7079083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Form preferences in successive discrimination learning of young chicks.
    Zolman JF; Pursley DG; Hall JA; Sahley CL
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1975 Dec; 89(10):1180-91. PubMed ID: 1202092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Single alternation discrimination learning in retarded adolescents as a function of within-trials variability.
    Clinton L; Evans RA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1972 Jan; 76(4):434-9. PubMed ID: 5060205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual preference and two-cue discrimination learning in octopus.
    Messenger JB; Sanders GD
    Anim Behav; 1972 Aug; 20(3):580-5. PubMed ID: 4676787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. POSITION REVERSAL VS. DIMENSION REVERSAL IN NORMAL AND RETARDED CHILDREN.
    MILGRAM NA; FURTH HG
    Child Dev; 1964 Sep; 35():701-8. PubMed ID: 14203806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contingent information processing: contingent and precued classification.
    Garner WR
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 Sep; 38(3):237-48. PubMed ID: 4088816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flexibility of accuracy versus speed orientation in reflective and impulsive children.
    Inagaki K; Hatano G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Jun; 48(3 Pt 2):1099-1108. PubMed ID: 492877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The salience of two cues for pattern recognition in the rat.
    Niemi RR; Dodwell PC
    Can J Psychol; 1971 Oct; 25(5):375-83. PubMed ID: 5120604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. SOME SPECULATIONS CONCERNING THE LAG BETWEEN PERCEIVING AND PERFORMING.
    MACCOBY EE; BEE HL
    Child Dev; 1965 Jun; 36():367-77. PubMed ID: 14300860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Observation and discrimination learning in the rat: specific and nonspecific effects.
    Kohn B; Dennis M
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1972 Feb; 78(2):292-6. PubMed ID: 5058465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of stimulus dimension predisposition in discrimination learning by retarded children.
    Bond JB; Black KN; Raskin LM
    Train Sch Bull (Vinel); 1973 Nov; 70(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 4767945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.