These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14260086)

  • 1. AN EVALUATION OF REAGENT-IMPREGNATED PAPER STRIPS FOR USE IN THE PROCESS OF IDENTIFYING CERTAIN SPECIES OF CLINICALLY IMPORTANT BACTERIA.
    GANDELMAN AL; MANN PH
    Curr Ther Res Clin Exp; 1965 Feb; 7():130-8. PubMed ID: 14260086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of reagent-impregnated ("Patho-Tec") test papers in the identification of Enterobacteriaceae and similar bacteria.
    Narayan KG; Guinée PA; Mossel DA
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 1967; 33(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 4292637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of reagent-impregnated paper strips and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Weaver DK; Lee EK; Leahy MS
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1968 Apr; 49(4):494-9. PubMed ID: 4296266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. AN EVALUATION OF REAGENT-IMPREGNATED PAPER STRIPS FOR USE IN THE PROCESS OF IDENTIFYING CERTAIN SPECIES OF CLINICALLY IMPORTANT BACTERIA. II. TESTING FOR THE PRODUCTION OF INDOLE.
    MANN PH; GANDELMAN AL
    Curr Ther Res Clin Exp; 1965 Aug; 7():510-2. PubMed ID: 14331682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Stable paper indicator systems for rapid identification of microorganisms].
    Blokhina IN; Lavrovskaia VM; Al'tman RSh
    Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 1978 Jul; (7):112-5. PubMed ID: 211761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [New methods for simplification of the multi "colored series"].
    Linzenmeier G
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1972 May; 220(1):186-93. PubMed ID: 4145564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the PathoTec "Rapid I-D System" and two additional Experimental reagent-impregnated paper strips.
    Rosner R
    Appl Microbiol; 1973 Dec; 26(6):890-3. PubMed ID: 4588197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of the efficacy of seven paper-reagent strips and conventional biochemical tests in identifying gram-negative organisms.
    Matsen JM; Sherris JC
    Appl Microbiol; 1969 Sep; 18(3):452-7. PubMed ID: 4907007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [APPLICATION OF SOME ENZYME REACTIONS TO THE STUDY OF DERMATOPHYTES].
    BOURDON JL; PECHERE JC
    Pathol Biol; 1963 Dec; 11():1387-90. PubMed ID: 14115981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of PathoTec-tm strips in diagnostic bacteriology.
    Small NN
    Am J Med Technol; 1968 Feb; 34(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 4877309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the redesigned Enterotube and its interpretation systems.
    Wüst J; Kayser FH
    Pathol Microbiol (Basel); 1974; 40(6):316-25. PubMed ID: 4604453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of reagent impregnated paper strips as an aid in the identification of certain gram negative organisms.
    Gandelman AL
    Am J Med Technol; 1966; 32(2):85-7. PubMed ID: 5324537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of reagent-impregnated strips for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Martin WJ; Bartes SF; Ball MM
    Am J Med Technol; 1971 Mar; 37(3):99-101. PubMed ID: 4927898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid presumptive identification of enterics with reagent impregnated paper strips.
    Prevorsek M; Kronish DP; Schwartz BS
    Am J Med Technol; 1968 May; 34(5):271-86. PubMed ID: 4871007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conductimetry in enzyme studies.
    Lawrence AJ; Moores GR
    Eur J Biochem; 1972 Jan; 24(3):538-46. PubMed ID: 4621707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simplified method for identification of enteric and other gram-negative bacteria using reagent-impregnated strips.
    Borchardt KA
    Tech Bull Regist Med Technol; 1968 Apr; 38(4):98-100. PubMed ID: 4871248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differentiation of bacteria by indoxyl butyrate paper strip method.
    Rodler M; Bélteky A; Svidró A
    Acta Microbiol Acad Sci Hung; 1973 Feb; 20(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 4590550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a reagent-impregnated strip for detection of nitrate reduction by bacterial isolates.
    Yu P; Birk RJ; Washington JA
    Tech Bull Regist Med Technol; 1969 Nov; 39(11):257-9. PubMed ID: 4914768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A SIMPLE MODIFICATION CONTRIBUTED TO THE TECHNIC OF DETECTION OF LYSINE DECARBOXYLASE IN BACTERIOLOGY].
    RICHARD C
    Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris); 1964 Apr; 106():653-5. PubMed ID: 14145250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [On present possibilities of identifying Escherichia coli as indicator of fecal contamination in hygienic control of drinking water].
    Schubert RH; Mann SW
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig; 1968; 208(4):498-506. PubMed ID: 4939316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.