These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. NONRELATIONAL JUDGEMENT OF SIZE AND DISTANCE. EPSTEIN W Am J Psychol; 1965 Mar; 78():120-3. PubMed ID: 14270412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. MONOCULAR AND BINOCULAR COMPARISON OF APPARENT SIZE. FRIED R Am J Psychol; 1964 Sep; 77():476-9. PubMed ID: 14196610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. SOME NEW STEREOSCOPIC PHENOMENA AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR THE THEORY OF STEREOPSIS. KAUFMAN L Am J Psychol; 1965 Mar; 78():1-20. PubMed ID: 14270425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. IS BINOCULAR CORRESPONDENCE AND DISPARITY STILL A DOMINANT FACTOR IN BINOCULAR DEPTH PERCEPTION? ZAJAC JL Psychol Bull; 1964 Jul; 62():56-66. PubMed ID: 14176652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. THE TRAPEZOIDAL ILLUSION AS A FUNCTION OF AGE, INTELLECTUAL STATUS, SIZE CONSTANCY, AND FORM DISCRIMINATION. RAJALAKSHMI R; JEEVES M J Genet Psychol; 1965 Mar; 106():141-8. PubMed ID: 14273708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Letter: On the origin of changes in the horopter deviation. Jones R Vision Res; 1974 Oct; 14(10):1047-9. PubMed ID: 4432387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Retinal and assumed size cues as determinants of size and distance perception. BAIRD JC J Exp Psychol; 1963 Aug; 66():155-62. PubMed ID: 13969069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Monocular stereoscopic vision and gradients of retinal induction. MOTOKAWA K; NAKAGAWA D; KOHATA T J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1956 Aug; 49(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 13345918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. VARIABILITY IN VISUAL THRESHOLDS. JACKSON JM J Psychol; 1965 Jan; 59():17-28. PubMed ID: 14244136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Depth perception in the praying mantis. Maldonado H; Rodriguez E Physiol Behav; 1972 Apr; 8(4):751-9. PubMed ID: 5038145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A TEST OF THE INVARIANCE OF THE RATIO OF PERCEIVED SIZE TO PERCEIVED DISTANCE. GOGEL WC; WIST ER; HARKER GS Am J Psychol; 1963 Dec; 76():537-53. PubMed ID: 14082652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. STEREOSCOPIC DEPTH PERCEPTION AND EXPOSURE DELAY BETWEEN IMAGES TO THE TWO EYES. OGLE KN J Opt Soc Am; 1963 Nov; 53():1296-304. PubMed ID: 14082109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. NEURAL LIMITATIONS OF VISUAL EXCITABILITY. VII. NONHOMONYMOUS RETROCHIASMAL INTERACTION. BATTERSBY WS; OESTERREICH RE; STURR JF Am J Physiol; 1964 May; 206():1181-8. PubMed ID: 14208963 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scalar perceptions with binocular cues of distance. Gogel WC Am J Psychol; 1972 Dec; 85(4):477-97. PubMed ID: 4660703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. INTEROCULAR TRANSFER OF PATTERN-DISCRIMINATION IN THE GOLDFISH. SHAPIRO SM Am J Psychol; 1965 Mar; 78():21-38. PubMed ID: 14270426 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Perception. Weintraub DJ Annu Rev Psychol; 1975; 26():263-89. PubMed ID: 1094929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The familiar-size cue to distance and stereoscopic depth perception. Predebon J Perception; 1993; 22(8):985-95. PubMed ID: 8190600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptual learning resulting from exposure to a stimulus-invariant. Epstein W Am J Psychol; 1967 Jun; 80(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 6058758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. ACCOMMODATION AS A CUE TO DISTANCE. HEINEMANN EG; NACHMIAS J Am J Psychol; 1965 Mar; 78():139-42. PubMed ID: 14270419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]