These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14271320)

  • 1. MOMENTS OF AREA AND OF THE PERIMETER OF VISUAL FORM AS PREDICTORS OF DISCRIMINATION PERFORMANCE.
    ZUSNE L
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Mar; 69():213-20. PubMed ID: 14271320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual search, stimulus density, and subnormal intelligence.
    Das JP
    Am J Ment Defic; 1971 Nov; 76(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 5148367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. STIMULUS CORRELATES OF VISUAL PATTERN DISCRIMINATION BY HUMANS: AREA AND CONTOUR.
    POLIDORA VJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Mar; 69():221-3. PubMed ID: 14271321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Random-walk and accumulator models of psychophysical discrimination: a critical evaluation.
    Heath RA
    Perception; 1984; 13(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 6473053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. STIMULUS CORRELATES OF VISUAL PATTERN DISCRIMINATION BY MONKEYS: AREA AND CONTOUR.
    POLIDORA VJ; THOMPSON WJ
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1964 Oct; 58():264-9. PubMed ID: 14215401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gestalt variables and feature measures as predictors of discrimination latency for polygon patterns.
    Mavrides CM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Dec; 33(3):919-25. PubMed ID: 5127214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of complexity on interpreting "Chernoff" faces.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Pachella RG
    Hum Factors; 1982 Feb; 24(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 7068150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Some new methods for the analysis of lateral interactions that influence the visual evoked potential.
    Ratliff F; Zemon V
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1982; 388():113-24. PubMed ID: 6953864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The sensitivity of response measures of alphanumeric legibility to variations in dot matrix display parameters.
    Snyder HL; Taylor GB
    Hum Factors; 1979 Aug; 21(4):457-71. PubMed ID: 478548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. VISUAL DISCRIMINATION IN ANIMALS.
    SUTHERLAND NS
    Br Med Bull; 1964 Jan; 20():54-9. PubMed ID: 14104098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. INFORMATION AND REACTION TIME FOR "NAMING" RESPONSES.
    MORIN RE; KONICK A; TROXELL N; MCPHERSON S
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Sep; 70():309-14. PubMed ID: 14343260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Foveal and parafoveal discrimination of curved and straight lines.
    Williams LJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Dec; 55(3 Pt 1):734. PubMed ID: 7162906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the "misguided" use of reaction-time differences: a discussion of Ratcliff and Hacker (1981).
    Proctor RW; Rao KV
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Jun; 31(6):601-4. PubMed ID: 7122199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of lowercase letters in peripheral vision: a discrimination matrix based on saccade latencies.
    Jacobs AM; Nazir TA; Heller O
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jul; 46(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 2755768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discrimination of Identikit constructions of faces: evidence for a dual processing strategy.
    Matthews ML
    Percept Psychophys; 1978 Feb; 23(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 643510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition.
    Biederman I; Ju G
    Cogn Psychol; 1988 Jan; 20(1):38-64. PubMed ID: 3338267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Target-distractor discriminability in visual search.
    Pashler H
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Apr; 41(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 3588236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perimeter, complexity, and form discrimination learning by cats.
    Derdzinski D; Warren JM
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1969 Jul; 68(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 5808816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual and acoustic processing in making same-different judgments.
    Yaworsky KB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Apr; 56(2):499-504. PubMed ID: 6866659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attending to different levels of structure in a visual image.
    Kinchla RA; Solis-Macias V; Hoffman J
    Percept Psychophys; 1983 Jan; 33(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 6844087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.