These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14271325)

  • 1. SIMILARITY IN STIMULUS MATERIAL AND STIMULUS TASK ON THE FORMATION OF A NEW SCALE OF JUDGMENT.
    TRESSELT ME
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Mar; 69():241-5. PubMed ID: 14271325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EFFECTS OF ANCHORING ON WEIGHT JUDGMENTS OF NORMALS AND SCHIZOPHRENICS.
    WURSTER SA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1965 Mar; 1():274-8. PubMed ID: 14328734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensory and decision processes in anchor effects and aftereffects.
    McNicol D; Pennington CW
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Oct; 100(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 4745454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of instructions and hypnosis to minimize anchor effects.
    White BJ; Alter RD; Snow ME; Thorne DE
    J Exp Psychol; 1968 Jul; 77(3):415-21. PubMed ID: 5665573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How might the discrepancy in the effects of perceptual variables on numerosity judgment be reconciled?
    Tokita M; Ishiguchi A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1839-53. PubMed ID: 20952782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating stimuli from contrasting categories: truncation due to boundaries.
    Huttenlocher J; Hedges LV; Lourenco SF; Crawford LE; Corrigan B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):502-19. PubMed ID: 17696696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Commitment and expeience as determinants of assimilation and contrast.
    Thibaut J; Ross M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1969 Dec; 13(4):322-9. PubMed ID: 5359230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blind insight: metacognitive discrimination despite chance task performance.
    Scott RB; Dienes Z; Barrett AB; Bor D; Seth AK
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Dec; 25(12):2199-208. PubMed ID: 25384551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction outcome, S-R compatibility, and choice reaction time.
    Whitman CP; Geller ES
    J Exp Psychol; 1971 Dec; 91(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 5134673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EFFECT OF STIMULUS VARIABLES ON CHOICE REACTION TIMES AND THRESHOLDS.
    KASWAN J; YOUNG S
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 May; 69():511-4. PubMed ID: 14285607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A weight illusion produced by lifting movements.
    Davis CM; Taylor M; Brickett P
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Feb; 44(1):299-305. PubMed ID: 840602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Haunted by a doppelgänger: irrelevant facial similarity affects rule-based judgments.
    von Helversen B; Herzog SM; Rieskamp J
    Exp Psychol; 2014 Jan; 61(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 23895921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Humor response as related to violation of expectancies and to stimulus intensity in a weight-judgment task.
    Gerber WS; Routh DK
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Oct; 41(2):673-4. PubMed ID: 1187322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual development and categorization: I. An investigation of task demands, stimulus set similarity, and age.
    Burns B
    J Genet Psychol; 1986 Sep; 147(3):359-70. PubMed ID: 3772344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive decision making in a dynamic environment: a test of a sequential sampling model of relative judgment.
    Vuckovic A; Kwantes PJ; Neal A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Sep; 19(3):266-84. PubMed ID: 24059826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. THE JUDGMENT OF SIZE.
    TEGHTSOONIAN M
    Am J Psychol; 1965 Sep; 78():392-402. PubMed ID: 14344081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of stimulus inconsistency and discounting instructions in personality impression formation.
    Anderson NH; Jacobson A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1965 Oct; 2(4):531-9. PubMed ID: 5841358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An analysis of diagnostic reasoning. II. The strategy of intermediate decisions.
    Feinstein AR
    Yale J Biol Med; 1973 Oct; 46(4):264-83. PubMed ID: 4775683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cue abstraction and exemplar memory in categorization.
    Juslin P; Jones S; Olsson H; Winman A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):924-41. PubMed ID: 14516225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Post-decision biases reveal a self-consistency principle in perceptual inference.
    Luu L; Stocker AA
    Elife; 2018 May; 7():. PubMed ID: 29785928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.