138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1427397)
1. A comparison of staging systems for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva.
Hopkins MP; Reid GC; Johnston CM; Morley GW
Gynecol Oncol; 1992 Oct; 47(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 1427397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: prognostic factors influencing survival.
Hopkins MP; Reid GC; Vettrano I; Morley GW
Gynecol Oncol; 1991 Nov; 43(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 1743551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of the new FIGO 2009 staging classification for vulvar cancer on prognosis and stage distribution.
Tabbaa ZM; Gonzalez J; Sznurkowski JJ; Weaver AL; Mariani A; Cliby WA
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):147-52. PubMed ID: 22704951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the FIGO 2009 staging system for carcinoma of the vulva.
Tan J; Chetty N; Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S; Crandon A; Garrett A; Land R; Nascimento M; Nicklin J; Perrin L; Obermair A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Mar; 22(3):498-502. PubMed ID: 22367324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New FIGO staging system of vulvar cancer indeed provides a better reflection of prognosis.
van der Steen S; de Nieuwenhof HP; Massuger L; Bulten J; de Hullu JA
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Dec; 119(3):520-5. PubMed ID: 20875914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical staging of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Analysis of treatment and survival.
Origoni M; Dindelli M; Ferrari D; Frigerio L; Rossi M; Ferrari A
Int Surg; 1996; 81(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 8803710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the new FIGO staging system (2009) for vulvar cancer in the Chinese population.
Li J; Cai Y; Ke G; Xiang L; Wang L; Yang W; Wu X; Yang H
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 May; 137(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 25759305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic value of pathological patterns of lymph node positivity in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva stage III and IVA FIGO.
Origoni M; Sideri M; Garsia S; Carinelli SG; Ferrari AG
Gynecol Oncol; 1992 Jun; 45(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 1612509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Effectiveness of radical therapy in vulvar carcinoma. An analysis of 148 cases].
Bokhman JV; Maximov SJ; Ebert AD
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(4):166-72. PubMed ID: 9206922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An alternative way to measure the depth of invasion of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma in relation to prognosis.
van den Einden LC; Massuger LF; Jonkman JK; Bult P; de Hullu JA; Bulten J
Mod Pathol; 2015 Feb; 28(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 25189641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Results of surgical treatment of vulvar cancer].
Kreienberg R; Beck T; Bartzke G; Henne M; Friedberg F
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1990 May; 50(5):375-82. PubMed ID: 2373335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic variables in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva.
Shimm DS; Fuller AF; Orlow EL; Dosoretz DE; Aristizabal SA
Gynecol Oncol; 1986 Jul; 24(3):343-58. PubMed ID: 3721307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of prognostic indicators in squamous carcinoma of the vulva including nuclear DNA content.
Ballouk F; Ambros RA; Malfetano JH; Ross JS
Mod Pathol; 1993 May; 6(3):371-5. PubMed ID: 8346186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of clinical versus surgical staging systems in vulvar cancer.
Shanbour KA; Mannel RS; Morris PC; Yadack A; Walker JL
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 80(6):927-30. PubMed ID: 1448261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A suggested modification to FIGO stage III vulvar cancer.
Rouzier R; Preti M; Sideri M; Paniel BJ; Jones RW
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jul; 110(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 18436291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic value of the number and laterality of metastatic inguinal lymph nodes in vulvar cancer: revisiting the FIGO staging system.
Baiocchi G; Silva Cestari FM; Rocha RM; Lavorato-Rocha A; Maia BM; Cestari LA; Kumagai LY; Faloppa CC; Fukazawa EM; Badiglian-Filho L; Sant'ana Rodrigues I; Soares FA
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jul; 39(7):780-5. PubMed ID: 23518307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The clinicopathologic parameters and prognostic analysis of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma].
Wang TT; Zhang R; Yao HW; Wu LY; Li SM; Bai P; Li HJ
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2019 May; 41(5):384-388. PubMed ID: 31137174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Prognostic factors for local recurrence after primary en bloc radical vulvectomy and bilateral groin dissection.
Fonseca-Moutinho JA; Coelho MC; Silva DP
J Reprod Med; 2000 Aug; 45(8):672-8. PubMed ID: 10986688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The comparative study of former and latest FIGO staging of vulva cancer.
Sun X; Zhang Y; Sun J; Feng S; Yan M; Cheng H
Minerva Chir; 2012 Apr; 67(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 22487921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Staging for vulvar cancer.
Hacker NF; Barlow EL
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Aug; 29(6):802-11. PubMed ID: 25842047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
