These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. CROSS-CULTURE, CROSS-CONCEPT, AND CROSS-SUBJECT GENERALITY OF AFFECTIVE MEANING SYSTEMS. TANAKA Y; OSGOOD CE J Pers Soc Psychol; 1965 Aug; 2():143-53. PubMed ID: 14316974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. CONTENT AND ORDER IN THE FORMATION OF IMPRESSIONS. MINK WD; BRIGGS PF Percept Mot Skills; 1965 Jun; 20():765-70. PubMed ID: 14313991 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Statistical quality control in chemical and pharmaceutical production. DYER PF Manuf Chem Aerosol News; 1948 Jan; 19(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 18898866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical models bearing on the semantics of correlation; the non-replacement model. HOGBEN L; WATERHOUSE JA Hum Biol; 1949 Sep; 21(3):163-86. PubMed ID: 15393706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. THE SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL AND THE STRUCTURE OF INFERENCES AMONG ATTRIBUTES. KAHNEMAN D Am J Psychol; 1963 Dec; 76():554-67. PubMed ID: 14082653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. FUNCTIONAL VS NOMINAL ANTONYMY IN SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL SCALES. MORDKOFF AM Psychol Rep; 1965 Jun; 16():691-2. PubMed ID: 14302986 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The fate of activated information in impression formation: fluency of concept activation moderates the emergence of assimilation versus contrast. Greifeneder R; Bless H Br J Soc Psychol; 2010 Jun; 49(Pt 2):405-14. PubMed ID: 20100395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Standardization or age adjustment. Cormier KD; Pagano M Nutrition; 1998 Mar; 14(3):328-9. PubMed ID: 9583383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. How children and mothers express gender essentialism. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2004; 69(1):33-63. PubMed ID: 15291775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The complex interplay between semantics and grammar in impression formation. Shreves WB; Hart W; Adams JM; Guadagno RE; Eno CA Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 24950389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Feldman J; Narayanan S Brain Lang; 2004 May; 89(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 15068922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Concept differentiation by semantic and visual mediation. Hofman JE; Mikhaelovicz R Psychol Rep; 1975 Apr; 36(2):575-8. PubMed ID: 1144603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. FACTOR-STRUCTURE OF SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSES TO VISUAL FORMS AND PREDICTION OF FACTOR-SCORES FROM STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STIMULUS-SHAPES. ELLIOTT LL; TANNENBAUM PH Am J Psychol; 1963 Dec; 76():589-97. PubMed ID: 14082656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. GEOMETRIC VECTOR ORTHOGONAL SOLUTION FOR THE SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL SCALES OF SAGARA, ET AL. KASHIWAGI S Psychol Rep; 1965 Jun; 16():914. PubMed ID: 14303028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]