These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14280767)

  • 1. [EXPERIMENTAL COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE DIMENSIONAL STABILITY OF 4 GROUPS OF DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS].
    BACHMANN J
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1965 Apr; 75():434-73. PubMed ID: 14280767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A study of the dimensional stability of elastic materials used in taking of impressions].
    Modica R; Pezzoli M; Vercellino V
    Minerva Stomatol; 1969 Mar; 18(3):118-28. PubMed ID: 5255679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Elastic impression materials.
    Asgar K
    Dent Clin North Am; 1971 Jan; 15(1):81-98. PubMed ID: 4923236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Experimental study on the influence of the pressure applied to the mucosa during impression taking on the form of impression surface].
    Hirai Y
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1971 Aug; 71(8):1835-69. PubMed ID: 4936913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EVALUATION OF MATERIALS USED FOR INDIRECT TECHNICS.
    PEYTON FA
    Dent Clin North Am; 1965 Mar; 23():213-23. PubMed ID: 14276026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of disposable and custom-made impression trays on the accuracy of impressions.
    Burton JF; Hood JA; Plunkett DJ; Johnson SS
    J Dent; 1989 Jun; 17(3):121-3. PubMed ID: 2671076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Critical study of different impression technics for fixed prosthesis. Attempt at simplification].
    Chouraqui M
    Rev Fr Odontostomatol; 1968; 15(7):931-46. PubMed ID: 4879180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dimensional accuracy of combined reversible and irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials.
    Supowitz ML; Schnell RJ; Dykema RW; Goodacre CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Apr; 59(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 3283324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Impression and model materials, a functional unit].
    Finger W; Lockowandt P
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1972 Jul; 27(7):620-4. PubMed ID: 4557300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinically oriented evaluation of the accuracy of commonly used impression materials.
    Tjan AH; Whang SB; Tjan AH; Sarkissian R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Jul; 56(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 3522878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation between the degree of deformation of the stone die and the amount of the master die undercut. Part 1. Single tooth die.
    Murakami H; Takehana S; Abe T; Yamamoto Y; Takenaka M
    Aichi Gakuin Dent Sci; 1989; 2():57-65. PubMed ID: 2701499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
    Ishida K
    Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of alginate and elastomeric impression materials.
    Peutzfeldt A; Asmussen E
    Scand J Dent Res; 1989 Aug; 97(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 2678420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The new silicon-rubber impression material "Xirux" in enlargement of prostheses and in indirect inlay-technic].
    Schneider W
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1965 Nov; 20(11):1226-7. PubMed ID: 5319780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Indirect impression technic with a multi-layer hydrocolloid material].
    Node H
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1979 Mar; 46(1):105. PubMed ID: 381548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of reversible hydrocolloid impression material in a wet field.
    Stewart GP; Bagley RL; Froemling RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Jun; 51(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 6376782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digitization of dental alginate impression: Three-dimensional evaluation of point cloud.
    Kim SR; Lee WS; Kim WC; Kim HY; Kim JH
    Dent Mater J; 2015; 34(6):835-40. PubMed ID: 26632232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dimensional stability and accuracy of rubber impression materials.
    Henry PJ; Harnist DJ
    Aust Dent J; 1974 Jun; 19(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 4611404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro investigation into the physical properties of irreversible hydrocolloid alternatives.
    Patel RD; Kattadiyil MT; Goodacre CJ; Winer MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Nov; 104(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 20970539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Studies on the use of alginate impression material and the dependence of the impression result on various conditions of processing. 3. Dimensional accuracy].
    Welker D
    Stomatol DDR; 1974 Jun; 24(6):390-400. PubMed ID: 4605968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.