These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14280767)

  • 21. The dimensional stability of dental impression materials following immersion in disinfecting solutions.
    Martin N; Martin MV; Jedynakiewicz NM
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jun; 23(6):760-8. PubMed ID: 17353045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quality of stone dies produced by different impression materials. A comparative study of impression techniques.
    Wiktorsson G; Feder D
    Swed Dent J; 1983; 7(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 6348989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A simplified reliable impression technique using vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Pameijer CH
    J Conn State Dent Assoc; 1983 Oct; 57(4):159-60. PubMed ID: 6421899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Studies on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials. Part 2. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of casts made by both single polyether rubber impression and the combined reversible and irreversible hydrocolloid impression technique (author's transl)].
    Shigeto N; Inohara N; Yamada S
    Hiroshima Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1978; 10(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 396327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Alginate Materials and Dental Impression Technique: A Current State of the Art and Application to Dental Practice.
    Cervino G; Fiorillo L; Herford AS; Laino L; Troiano G; Amoroso G; Crimi S; Matarese M; D'Amico C; Nastro Siniscalchi E; Cicciù M
    Mar Drugs; 2018 Dec; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 30597945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Complete arch implant impression technique.
    Ma J; Rubenstein JE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):405-10. PubMed ID: 22633598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Characterization of the setting process of silicone dental rubbers.
    Braden M; Elliott JC
    J Dent Res; 1966; 45(4):1016-23. PubMed ID: 5224070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The combination hydrocolloid/alginate impression.
    Appleby DC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1983 Feb; 106(2):194-5. PubMed ID: 6339584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modern elastic impression materials.
    Dreyer-Jörgensen K
    Rev Belge Med Dent; 1966; 21(3):269-77. PubMed ID: 5332941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [A combined method using hydrocolloids and alginates for impression making in fixed prosthetics].
    Solimei GE; Messina P; Passalacqua C
    Parodontol Stomatol (Nuova); 1984; 23(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 6441909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of tray design upon elastic impression materials.
    Mitchell JV; Damele JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1970 Jan; 23(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 4902404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Two- and three-dimensional accuracy of dental impression materials: effects of storage time and moisture contamination.
    Chandran DT; Jagger DC; Jagger RG; Barbour ME
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2010; 20(5):243-9. PubMed ID: 21084736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Disinfection procedures: their efficacy and effect on dimensional accuracy and surface quality of an irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Rentzia A; Coleman DC; O'Donnell MJ; Dowling AH; O'Sullivan M
    J Dent; 2011 Feb; 39(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 21093528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The accuracy of stone dies made from rubber impression materials.
    Stackhouse JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1970 Oct; 24(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 5272351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative study of dimensional accuracy of different impression techniques using addition silicone impression material.
    Penaflor CF; Semacio RC; De Las Alas LT; Uy HG
    J Philipp Dent Assoc; 1998; 49(4):37-49. PubMed ID: 10202524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Dimensional accuracy of partially edentulous arch in relation to impression material].
    Biffar R; Pfaller I
    Quintessenz; 1990 Jun; 41(6):1047-55. PubMed ID: 2204087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A randomized clinical trial to compare diagnostic casts made using plastic and metal trays.
    Damodara EK; Litaker MS; Rahemtulla F; McCracken MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Dec; 104(6):364-71. PubMed ID: 21095399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A historical review of hydrocolloids and an investigation of the dimensional accuracy of the new alginates for crown and bridge impressions when using stock trays.
    Hansson O; Eklund J
    Swed Dent J; 1984; 8(2):81-95. PubMed ID: 6377548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The rubber impression for pin restorations.
    Carter R
    Aust Dent J; 1972 Dec; 17(6):434-5. PubMed ID: 4571663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of disinfecting alginate and addition cured silicone rubber impression materials on the physical properties of impressions and resultant casts.
    al-Omari WM; Jones JC; Wood DJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1998 Sep; 6(3):103-10. PubMed ID: 10218014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.