BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1428546)

  • 1. Is oculokinetic perimetry useful?
    Abreu Reyes JA; Gonzalez de la Rosa M; Sanchez Mendez M; Mesa Moreno CG; Santos Barrera R
    Int Ophthalmol; 1992 Sep; 16(4-5):215-9. PubMed ID: 1428546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with standard perimetric threshold testing.
    Felius J; Langerhorst CT; van den Berg TJ; Greve EL
    Int Ophthalmol; 1992 Sep; 16(4-5):221-6. PubMed ID: 1428547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the oculokinetic perimetry glaucoma screener with two types of visual field analyser.
    Greve M; Chisholm IA
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1993 Aug; 28(5):201-6. PubMed ID: 8221366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
    Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [First experience with the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter® on patients with ocular hypertension and preperimetric glaucoma].
    Hasler S; Stürmer J
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Apr; 229(4):319-22. PubMed ID: 22495996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Longitudinal comparison of temporal-modulation perimetry with white-on-white and blue-on-yellow perimetry in ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Casson EJ; Johnson CA; Shapiro LR
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1993 Aug; 10(8):1792-806. PubMed ID: 8350162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Suprathreshold static perimetry in glaucoma and other optic nerve disease.
    Johnson CA; Keltner JL; Balestrery FG
    Ophthalmology; 1979 Jul; 86(7):1278-86. PubMed ID: 233860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of different screening methods for the detection of visual field defects in early glaucoma.
    Marraffa M; Marchini G; Albertini R; Bonomi L
    Int Ophthalmol; 1989 Jan; 13(1-2):43-5. PubMed ID: 2744954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Application of oculokinetic perimetry in examination of the eye].
    Wakakura M; Kageyama M; Hamanaka T; Shimizu K; Joshita H; Shimizu T; Baba H; Kisara M; Miyata M
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Jul; 100(7):551-7. PubMed ID: 8741340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Johnson CA; Adams AJ; Casson EJ; Brandt JD
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 May; 111(5):645-50. PubMed ID: 8489447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of oculokinetic perimetry.
    Chia WL; Goldberg I; Bauman A
    Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1999 Oct; 27(5):306-11. PubMed ID: 10571390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is visual field evaluation using multiple correlations and linear regressions useful? An evaluation of Delphi perimetry.
    Wishart PK; Wardrop DR; Kosmin AS
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 Jul; 236(7):493-500. PubMed ID: 9672794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Motion automated perimetry identifies early glaucomatous field defects.
    Bosworth CF; Sample PA; Gupta N; Bathija R; Weinreb RN
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1998 Sep; 116(9):1153-8. PubMed ID: 9747672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Liverpool Delphi evaluation.
    González de la Rosa M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1999 Mar; 237(3):259-61. PubMed ID: 10090591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of oculokinetic perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma.
    Alvarez E; Damato BE; Jay JL; McClure E
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1988 Apr; 72(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 3378021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency-doubling threshold perimetry in predicting glaucoma in a population-based study: The Beijing Eye Study.
    Wang YX; Xu L; Zhang RX; Jonas JB
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 125(10):1402-6. PubMed ID: 17923550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression be Predicted by Structural and Functional Measures?
    Schrems WA; Schrems-Hoesl LM; Mardin CY; Laemmer R; Kruse FE; Horn FK
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Apr; 26(4):373-382. PubMed ID: 28118204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of high-pass resolution perimetry and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Martinez GA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1995 Feb; 119(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 7832226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing the Performance of Compass Perimetry With Humphrey Field Analyzer in Eyes With Glaucoma.
    Rao HL; Raveendran S; James V; Dasari S; Palakurthy M; Reddy HB; Pradhan ZS; Rao DA; Puttaiah NK; Devi S
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar; 26(3):292-297. PubMed ID: 27977480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.