These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. [Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes]. Meyer MW; Yevelenko V; Hoy L; Meyer A; Erb C Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):899-903. PubMed ID: 17131250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of the Keeler PULSAIR 2000 tonometer. Pearce CD; Kohl P; Yolton RL J Am Optom Assoc; 1992 Feb; 63(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 1583262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of a new non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation. Moseley MJ; Evans NM; Fielder AR Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 3)():332-7. PubMed ID: 2612679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the performance of the Nidek NT-2000 noncontact tonometer with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 and the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Cho P; Lui T Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jan; 74(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 9148267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of intraocular pressure measurement by three tonometers in normal subjects. Prabhakar SK; Mahesh BS; Shanthamallappa M Nepal J Ophthalmol; 2013; 5(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 24172555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pressure phosphene self-tonometry: a comparison with goldmann tonometry in glaucoma patients. Lam DS; Leung DY; Chiu TY; Fan DS; Cheung EY; Wong TY; Lai JS; Tham CC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):3131-6. PubMed ID: 15326131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the Pulsair noncontact tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Climenhaga H; Plucinska H Can J Ophthalmol; 1989 Feb; 24(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 2713754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients. Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation. Moseley MJ; Thompson JR; Deutsch J; Misson GP; Naylor G; Tan-Yee A; Taylor RH; Fielder AR Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():127-30. PubMed ID: 8325401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of tonometry with the Keeler air puff non-contact tonometer "Pulsair" and the Goldmann applanation tonometer]. Yücel AA; Stürmer J; Gloor B Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1990 Oct; 197(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 2280569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On repeated corneal applanation with the Goldmann and two non-contact tonometers. Almubrad TM; Ogbuehi KC Clin Exp Optom; 2010 Mar; 93(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 20406256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Glaucoma screening in primary care: the role of noncontact tonometry. Ralston ME; Choplin NT; Hollenbach KA; Applegate BJ; Henn TW J Fam Pract; 1992 Jan; 34(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 1728657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproducibility with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer. Vernon SA Br J Ophthalmol; 1995 Jun; 79(6):554-7. PubMed ID: 7626572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Contemporary possibilities of intraocular pressure measurement]. Hornová J; Baxant A Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2013 Oct; 69(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 24437996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a new rebound tonometer for self-measurement of intraocular pressure. Dabasia PL; Lawrenson JG; Murdoch IE Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 100(8):1139-43. PubMed ID: 26614630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]