87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1428741)
1. Changes in serum magnesium during excretory urography. A comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast media.
Sahler LG; Prentice LI; Morris TW; Segal AJ
Invest Radiol; 1992 Aug; 27(8):628-31. PubMed ID: 1428741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Knee arthrography: effects of various contrast media and epinephrine on synovial fluid.
Corbetti F; Malatesta V; Camposampiero A; Mazzi A; Punzi L; Angelini F; Vigo M; Todesco S
Radiology; 1986 Oct; 161(1):195-8. PubMed ID: 3763866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A retrospective survey of delayed adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media.
Yamaguchi K; Takanashi I; Kanauchi T; Hoshi T; Kubota H
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Nov; 52(11):1565-70. PubMed ID: 1465338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the side-effects of low-osmolar contrast media in intravenous urography.
Foord KD; Kaye B; Howard J; Cumberland DC
Clin Radiol; 1985 Jul; 36(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 4064528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the rates of adverse drug reactions. Ionic contrast agents, ionic agents combined with steroids, and nonionic agents.
Wolf GL; Mishkin MM; Roux SG; Halpern EF; Gottlieb J; Zimmerman J; Gillen J; Thellman C
Invest Radiol; 1991 May; 26(5):404-10. PubMed ID: 2055736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic efficacy of excretory urography with low-dose, nonionic contrast media.
Gavant ML; Ellis JV; Klesges LM
Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):657-60. PubMed ID: 1535877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biochemical aspects on adverse reactions to contrast media. Changes of kininogen levels in dog plasma after intravenous injections of iohexol, iopamidol, and iothalamate.
Tanaka T; Katayama H; Shirakata A; Takahasi H
Invest Radiol; 1988 Sep; 23 Suppl 1():S195-6. PubMed ID: 3198342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intravenous urography with low-osmolality contrast agents: theoretical considerations and clinical findings.
Dawson P; Heron C; Marshall J
Clin Radiol; 1984 May; 35(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 6713791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ventilatory function during urography: a comparison of iopamidol and sodium iothalamate.
Wilson AR; Davies P
Clin Radiol; 1988 Sep; 39(5):490-3. PubMed ID: 3180669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Excretory urography: comparison of the ionic contrast medium amidotrezoic acid with the non-ionic contrast medium iohexol].
Grabenwöger F; Dock W; Pinterits F; Metz V
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1989 Feb; 139(3):48-50. PubMed ID: 2650470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in intravenous urography: clinical trial in 1,000 consecutive patients.
Jacobsson BF; Jorulf H; Kalantar MS; Narasimham DL
Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):601-5. PubMed ID: 3283830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of contrast media on renal function in children: comparison of ionic and non-ionic agents.
Buyan N; Arab M; Hasanoğlu E; Gökçora N; Ercan S
Turk J Pediatr; 1995; 37(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 8560597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of two strengths of iohexol and iothalamate in urography.
Davies P; Glaves J; Panto P; Richardson RE
Urol Radiol; 1987; 9(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 3603888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image quality and safety after iodixanol in intravenous urography; a comparison with iohexol.
Sundgren PC; Bååth L; Törnquist C; Hougens Grynne B; Kjaersgaard P; Almén T
Br J Radiol; 1996 Aug; 69(824):699-703. PubMed ID: 8949670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective trial of ionic vs nonionic contrast agents in routine clinical practice: comparison of adverse effects.
Wolf GL; Arenson RL; Cross AP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 May; 152(5):939-44. PubMed ID: 2495706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of nonionic radiographic contrast medium on serum electrolytes and proteins during intravenous urography.
Brunet WG; Hutton LC; Henderson AR
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1989 Jun; 40(3):139-41. PubMed ID: 2736409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Excretory urography with iohexol: evaluation in children.
Magill HL; Clarke EA; Fitch SJ; Boulden TF; Ramirez R; Siegle RL; Somes GW
Radiology; 1986 Dec; 161(3):625-30. PubMed ID: 3786708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of ionic and nonionic contrast media on regional distribution of thallium-201 in rabbits.
Seto H; Kageyama M; Shimizu M; Nagayoshi T; Futatsuya R; Kakishita M
Radiat Med; 1995; 13(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7597199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media on clot structure, platelet function and thrombolysis mediated by tissue plasminogen activator in plasma clots.
Carr ME; Carr SL; Merten SR
Haemostasis; 1995; 25(4):172-81. PubMed ID: 7557656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Delayed hypersensitivity reaction after infusion of nonionic intravenous contrast material for an excretory urogram: a case report and review of the literature.
Stovsky MD; Seftel AD; Resnick MI
J Urol; 1995 May; 153(5):1641-3. PubMed ID: 7714996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
