These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14287822)

  • 1. BINARY-CHOICE SEQUENCES OF RETARDATES, NORMAL CHILDREN, AND COLLEGE STUDENTS UNDER RANDOM- AND PATTERN-SET INSTRUCTIONS.
    GERJUOY IR; GERJUOY H
    Am J Ment Defic; 1965 May; 69():854-9. PubMed ID: 14287822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CHOICE-SEQUENCE PATTERNS IN BINARY-CHOICE "LEARNING" BY RETARDATES.
    GERJUOY H; GERJUOY IR
    Am J Ment Defic; 1964 Nov; 69():425-31. PubMed ID: 14223561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EFFECT OF INSTRUCTIONS ON A TWO-CHOICE PROBABILITY LEARNING TASK.
    CAUTELA JR
    Psychol Rep; 1965 Apr; 16():465-6. PubMed ID: 14285852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. INCENTIVE SCALING IN MENTAL RETARDATES BY THE METHOD OF PAIRED COMPARISONS.
    TYRRELL DJ; WITRYOL SL; SILVERG E
    Am J Ment Defic; 1963 Sep; 68():225-7. PubMed ID: 14051228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guessing behavior of normal and retarded children under two random reinforcement conditions.
    Goulet LR; Barclay A
    Child Dev; 1967 Jun; 38(2):545-52. PubMed ID: 6057399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lateral and choice-sequence preferences by normals and retardates in a binary-choice task.
    Winters JJ; Gerjuoy IR; Pullen MM
    Am J Ment Defic; 1969 Nov; 74(3):382-8. PubMed ID: 5361374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CHOICE BEHAVIOR IN GAME PLAYING SITUATIONS AS A FUNCTION OF AMOUNT AND PROBABILITY OF REINFORCEMENT.
    PYRON B
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Oct; 68():420-1. PubMed ID: 14216502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. RETARDATE DISCRIMINATION LEARNING FOLLOWING DIFFERENTIAL CONDITIONING OF THE CHOICE-POINT STIMULI.
    EIMAS PD; SHEPP BE
    Child Dev; 1964 Sep; 35():685-93. PubMed ID: 14203804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. TV preference as a technique for selection of reinforcers.
    Striefel S; Smeets PM
    Psychol Rep; 1974 Aug; 35(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 4423715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Isolating variables which affect TV preferences of retarded children.
    Striefel S
    Psychol Rep; 1974 Aug; 35(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 4417985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. HUMAN PROBABILITY LEARNING WITH FORCED TRAINING TRAILS AND CERTAIN AND UNCERTAIN OUTCOME CHOICE TRIALS.
    ARIMA JK
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jul; 70():43-50. PubMed ID: 14315129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison for mental retardates of no-choice, initial-choice, and idiosyncratic-choice reward strategies.
    Alexander DD
    Psychol Rep; 1974 Aug; 35(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 4417849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. VERBAL LEARNING AND RETENTION AS A FUNCTION OF NUMBER OF LISTS IN RETARDATES.
    HOUSE BJ; SMITH M; ZEAMAN D
    Am J Ment Defic; 1964 Sep; 69():239-43. PubMed ID: 14215864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. TWO-CHOICE PROBABILITY LEARNING IN THE RAT AS A FUNCTION OF INCENTIVE, PROBABILITY OF REINFORCEMENT, AND TRAINING PROCEDURE.
    UHL CN
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Nov; 66():443-9. PubMed ID: 14081998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binary-choice responses of retardates, normal children and college students to similar or dissimilar stimuli.
    Gerjuoy IR; Winters JJ
    Am J Ment Defic; 1965 Nov; 70(3):474-7. PubMed ID: 5856599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SUBJECTIVE REINFORCEMENT IN THE PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING OF RETARDED AND NORMAL CHILDREN.
    EIMAS PD
    Can J Psychol; 1964 Sep; 18():183-96. PubMed ID: 14216120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EFFECTS OF INSTRUCTIONS AND INITIAL REINFORCEMENT ON FIXED-INTERVAL BEHAVIOR IN RETARDATES.
    HEADRICK MW
    Am J Ment Defic; 1963 Nov; 68():425-32. PubMed ID: 14055767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Motivational differences: cultural-familial retardates vs. normal subjects on expectancy for failure.
    MacMillan DL
    Am J Ment Defic; 1969 Sep; 74(2):254-8. PubMed ID: 5822305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EFFECTS OF REINFORCEMENT SHIFTS ON BENT-WIRE PERFORMANCE OF SEVERLY RETARDED CHILDREN.
    HOLLIS JH
    Am J Ment Defic; 1965 Jan; 69():531-5. PubMed ID: 14250440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSES OF PROFOUNDLY RETARDED CHILDREN TO SOCIAL STIMULATION.
    HOLLIS JH
    Psychol Rep; 1965 Jun; 16():977-84. PubMed ID: 14303046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.