229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1428846)
1. Twenty years after. The legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Outside the community.
Edgar H
Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(6):32-5. PubMed ID: 1428846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Twenty years after. The legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. The dangers of difference.
King PA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(6):35-8. PubMed ID: 1428847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Twenty years after. The legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. When evil intrudes.
Caplan AL
Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(6):29-32. PubMed ID: 1428845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Survivors of Tuskegee study get apology from Clinton.
Mitchell A
N Y Times Web; 1997 May; ():10. PubMed ID: 11647214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Tuskegee syphilis experiment: medical ethics, constitutionalism, and property in the body.
Roy B
Harv J Minor Public Health; 1995; 1(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 11656513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 1932 to 1972: implications for HIV education and AIDS risk education programs in the black community.
Thomas SB; Quinn SC
Am J Public Health; 1991 Nov; 81(11):1498-505. PubMed ID: 1951814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Tuskegee legacy. AIDS and the black community.
Jones JH
Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(6):38-40. PubMed ID: 1428848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Tuskegee as a metaphor.
Bowman JE
Science; 1999 Jul; 285(5424):47; author reply 49-50. PubMed ID: 10428699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Racism and research: the case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study.
Brandt AM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Dec; 8(6):21-9. PubMed ID: 721302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinton to express regret for experiment on blacks.
Stout D
N Y Times Web; 1997 Apr; ():B8. PubMed ID: 11647209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent in the clinical research setting: experimentation on human subjects.
Owens JF
Med Trial Tech Q; 1987; 33(3):335-50. PubMed ID: 11653829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal experimentation: legal implications of an ethical conundrum.
Wilson JP
Denver Law J; 1976; 53(4):581-642. PubMed ID: 11664590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. More than fact and fiction. Cultural memory and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study.
Reverby SM
Hastings Cent Rep; 2001; 31(5):22-8. PubMed ID: 12974115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The legacy of the Tuskegee syphilis experiments for emergency exception from informed consent.
Schmidt TA
Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Jan; 41(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 12514686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An overview of legal controls on human experimentation and the regulatory implications of taking Professor Katz seriously.
Goldner JA
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):63-134. PubMed ID: 11656325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Steps still being taken to undo damage of "America's Nuremberg".
Wolinsky H
Ann Intern Med; 1997 Aug; 127(4):I43-4. PubMed ID: 9454520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. JAMA 21 years ago: Panel discusses ethics of studies on humans -- especially the poor Proposed compensations for Tuskegee Study men.
Pace BP; Sullivan-Fowler M
JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(20):1692. PubMed ID: 11644855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment: biotechnology and the administrative state.
Roy B
J Natl Med Assoc; 1995 Jan; 87(1):56-67. PubMed ID: 7869408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "Tuskegee revisited" revisited.
Benedek TG
Hastings Cent Rep; 2002; 32(2):4; author reply 4-5. PubMed ID: 11998773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Historical Origins of the Tuskegee Experiment: The Dilemma of Public Health in the United States.
Park J
Uisahak; 2017 Dec; 26(3):545-578. PubMed ID: 29311536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
