These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1428894)

  • 1. A thermoluminescent dosimetry intercomparison in operational power station fields.
    Facey RA; Agnew DA; Hirning CR; Walsh ML
    Health Phys; 1992 Dec; 63(6):702-9. PubMed ID: 1428894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A survey of IAEA/WHO 60Co TLD postal dose intercomparison exercises during 1985-2003.
    Salman AS; Mahmood K; Orfi SD
    Health Phys; 2005 Jul; 89(1):89-91. PubMed ID: 15951695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of the effective dose equivalent in a nuclear reactor environment with a personal thermoluminescent dosimeter.
    Walsh ML; Johns HE
    Health Phys; 1984 Jan; 46(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 6693252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CaSO4:Dy and LiF:Mg, Cu, P thermoluminescent dosimeters for environmental monitoring in ambient areas of a nuclear power plant.
    Zeng XS; Zeng JX; Tan GX; Mai WJ
    Health Phys; 1996 Mar; 70(3):367-71. PubMed ID: 8609029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of environmental TLD data at a nuclear power station to estimate detection limits for radiation exposure due to station operation.
    Lang E; Hardeman J; Kahn B
    Health Phys; 1987 Jun; 52(6):775-85. PubMed ID: 3583742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurements of environmental background radiation at location of coal-fired power plants.
    Adrovic F; Prokić M; Ninković MM; Glisić R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(3):439-42. PubMed ID: 15385680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental simulation of personal dosimetry in production of medical radioisotopes by research reactor.
    Mossadegh N; Karimian A; Shahhosseini E; Mohammadzadeh A; Sheibani Sh
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):267-71. PubMed ID: 21862507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Personnel dosimetry intercomparison studies at the Health Physics Research Reactor: a summary (1974-80).
    Sims CS; Swaja RE
    Health Phys; 1982 Jan; 42(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 7056645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An intercomparison of neutron dosimeters and detectors for in-containment dosimetry.
    Auman LE; Miller WH; Graham CC; Stretch CD; Welty TJ; West L
    Health Phys; 1992 Feb; 62(2):190-3. PubMed ID: 1730563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Thermoluminescent dosimeter for the supervision of nuclear power plants.
    Leroux R
    Naturwissenschaften; 1986 Oct; 73(10):614-5. PubMed ID: 3785432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. International Atomic Energy Agency/World Health Organisation TLD radiotherapy dosimetry intercomparison.
    Huntley RB; Nette HP
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1993 Mar; 16(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 8470997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Calibration of TLD badges for photons of energy above 6 MeV and dosimetric intricacies in high energy gamma ray fields encountered in nuclear power plants.
    Pradhan AS; Bakshi AK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 98(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 12018745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eye lens dosimetry in Canadian CANDU nuclear power plants based on operational dosimetric quantities H
    Atanackovic J; Hanu AR; Byun SH
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2021 Nov; 177():109902. PubMed ID: 34481317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dose distribution from a degraded 60Co gamma field.
    Momeni MH
    Health Phys; 1986 Apr; 50(4):493-507. PubMed ID: 3790202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance testing of the environmental TLD system for the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station.
    Toke LF; Carson BH; Baker GG; McBride MH; Plato PA; Miklos JA
    Health Phys; 1984 May; 46(5):1013-20. PubMed ID: 6724910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of TLD algorithms for monochromatic fluorescent radiation and continuous spectrum X rays.
    Kim JL; Kim BH; Chang SY; Lee JK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 101(1-4):217-20. PubMed ID: 12382738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of film badges and thermoluminescent dosimeters used for environmental monitoring.
    Fitzsimmons CK; Horn W; Klein WL
    Radiat Data Rep; 1972 Oct; 13(10):537-45. PubMed ID: 5086816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of film and thermoluminescent dosimetry of high-energy electron beams in heterogeneous phantoms.
    el-Khatib E; Antolak J; Scrimger J
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 1584124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality assurance of personal beta particle dosemeters used for individual monitoring of occupationally exposed persons.
    Helmstädter K; Ambrosi P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):105-8. PubMed ID: 17337739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intercomparison of TL dosimetry (DIMOND programme).
    Kottou S; Papadimitriou D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):125-8. PubMed ID: 11487819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.