These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1429256)

  • 1. Effect of reversible hypoxia on the compared time courses of endocochlear potential and 2f1-f2 distortion products.
    Rebillard G; Lavigne-Rebillard M
    Hear Res; 1992 Oct; 62(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 1429256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vulnerability and adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions to endocochlear potential variation.
    Mills DM; Norton SJ; Rubel EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Oct; 94(4):2108-22. PubMed ID: 8227751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Indications of different distortion product otoacoustic emission mechanisms from a detailed f1,f2 area study.
    Knight RD; Kemp DT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jan; 107(1):457-73. PubMed ID: 10641654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
    Abel C; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Differences in furosemide-induced changes of summating potential and endocochlear potential in guinea pigs].
    Hu N; Jiang W; Wang L
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Oct; 34(5):282-5. PubMed ID: 12764825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation of the 2f
    Wen H; Bowling T; Meaud J
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():127-140. PubMed ID: 29801982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. I. Basic features and physiological vulnerability.
    Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK; Probst R; Coats AC
    Hear Res; 1987; 28(2-3):173-89. PubMed ID: 3654388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Studies on the generation mechanism of non-biological response in distortion product OTO-acoustic emission].
    Kawashima N; Ookubo H; Ase Y; Kusakari J
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1993 Apr; 96(4):601-8. PubMed ID: 8509932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanism of the production of the negative endocochlear DC potential in the guinea pig.
    Komune S; Huangfu M; Snow JB
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1983 Aug; 91(4):427-34. PubMed ID: 6415593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2.
    Siegel JH; Kim DO; Molnar CE
    J Neurophysiol; 1982 Feb; 47(2):303-28. PubMed ID: 7062102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In search of basal distortion product generators.
    Withnell RH; Lodde J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2116-23. PubMed ID: 17069309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
    Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Some observations on negative endocochlear potential during anoxia.
    Konishi T
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1979; 87(5-6):506-16. PubMed ID: 463522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit. II: Differential physiological vulnerability.
    Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Nov; 92(5):2662-82. PubMed ID: 1479129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in endocochlear potentials in response to anoxia in maturing and mature guinea pigs.
    Ohmura M; Yamamoto E
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1990; 248(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 2083075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions and their distortion products in guinea pigs].
    Guo M; Wang J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Mar; 16(1):63-6, 70. PubMed ID: 12553279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of isosorbide on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and endocochlear DC potential in experimentally induced hydropic ears.
    Okubo H; Tachihara N; Satoh S; Hara A; Kusakari J
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1997; 528():59-62. PubMed ID: 9288240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of various noise exposures on endocochlear potentials correlated with cochlear gross responses.
    Wang J; Li Q; Dong W; Chen J
    Hear Res; 1992 Apr; 59(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 1629044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intermediate endocochlear potential levels induced by hypoxia.
    Gafni M; Sohmer H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1976; 82(5-6):354-8. PubMed ID: 998204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.