These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1429297)

  • 1. A computer model to predict empty body weight in cattle from diet and animal characteristics.
    Williams CB; Keele JW; Waldo DR
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Oct; 70(10):3215-22. PubMed ID: 1429297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The development of a model to predict BW gain of growing cattle fed grass silage-based diets.
    Huuskonen A; Huhtanen P
    Animal; 2015 Aug; 9(8):1329-40. PubMed ID: 25891155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A computer model to predict the effects of level of nutrition on composition of empty body gain in beef cattle: II. Evaluation of the model.
    Williams CB; Keele JW; Bennett GL
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Mar; 70(3):858-66. PubMed ID: 1564009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A meta-analysis of passage rate estimated by rumen evacuation with cattle and evaluation of passage rate prediction models.
    Krizsan SJ; Ahvenjärvi S; Huhtanen P
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Dec; 93(12):5890-901. PubMed ID: 21094762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation in Appalachian pasture systems of the 1996 (update 2000) National Research Council model for weaning cattle.
    Whetsell MS; Rayburn EB; Osborne PI
    J Anim Sci; 2006 May; 84(5):1265-70. PubMed ID: 16612031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of wheat forage maturity and preservation method on forage chemical composition and performance of growing calves fed mixed diets.
    Beck PA; Stewart CB; Gray HC; Smith JL; Gunter SA
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Dec; 87(12):4133-42. PubMed ID: 19717767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of forage source and extruded linseed supplementation on methane emissions from growing dairy cattle of differing body weights.
    Hammond KJ; Humphries DJ; Crompton LA; Kirton P; Reynolds CK
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Nov; 98(11):8066-77. PubMed ID: 26364116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of forage and protein source on feedlot performance and carcass traits of Holstein and crossbred beef steers.
    Comerford JW; House RB; Harpster HW; Henning WR; Cooper JB
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Apr; 70(4):1022-31. PubMed ID: 1582930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of physical structure value in spring-harvested grass/clover silage and hay fed to heifers.
    Schulze AK; Nørgaard P; Byskov MV; Weisbjerg MR
    Animal; 2015 Feb; 9(2):275-84. PubMed ID: 25245025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of nitrogen excretion in feces and urine of beef cattle offered diets containing grass silage.
    Yan T; Frost JP; Keady TW; Agnew RE; Mayne CS
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Aug; 85(8):1982-9. PubMed ID: 17504962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of dietary forage source and amount of forage addition on intake, milk yield, and digestion for lactating dairy cows.
    West JW; Hill GM; Gates RN; Mullinix BG
    J Dairy Sci; 1997 Aug; 80(8):1656-65. PubMed ID: 9276805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A meta-analysis of feed digestion in dairy cows. 1. The effects of forage and concentrate factors on total diet digestibility.
    Nousiainen J; Rinne M; Huhtanen P
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5019-30. PubMed ID: 19762821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of rumen fiber pool in cattle from dietary, fecal, and animal variables.
    Huhtanen P; Detmann E; Krizsan SJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Jul; 99(7):5345-5357. PubMed ID: 27085408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting dry matter intake by growing and finishing beef cattle: evaluation of current methods and equation development.
    Anele UY; Domby EM; Galyean ML
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Jun; 92(6):2660-7. PubMed ID: 24867938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A dynamic model of metabolizable energy utilization in growing and mature cattle. III. Model evaluation.
    Williams CB; Jenkins TG
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Jun; 81(6):1390-8. PubMed ID: 12817485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of cattle age, forage level, and corn processing on diet digestibility and feedlot performance.
    Gorocica-Buenfil MA; Loerch SC
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Mar; 83(3):705-14. PubMed ID: 15705768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative digestibility by cattle versus sheep: effect of forage quality.
    Soto-Navarro SA; Lopez R; Sankey C; Capitan BM; Holland BP; Balstad LA; Krehbiel CR
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Apr; 92(4):1621-9. PubMed ID: 24663196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of diet composition and incubation time on feed indigestible neutral detergent fiber concentration in dairy cows.
    Krizsan SJ; Huhtanen P
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Mar; 96(3):1715-26. PubMed ID: 23312997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the National Research Council (2001) dairy model and derivation of new prediction equations. 1. Digestibility of fiber, fat, protein, and nonfiber carbohydrate.
    White RR; Roman-Garcia Y; Firkins JL; VandeHaar MJ; Armentano LE; Weiss WP; McGill T; Garnett R; Hanigan MD
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 May; 100(5):3591-3610. PubMed ID: 28259403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of microbial efficiency to predict MP supply when estimating protein requirements of growing beef cattle from performance.
    Watson AK; Klopfenstein TJ; Erickson GE; MacDonald JC; Wilkerson VA
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jul; 95(7):3184-3191. PubMed ID: 28727085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.