These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14300234)

  • 21. Imitative influences of consistent and inconsistent response consequences to a model on aggressive behavior in children.
    Rosekrans MA; Hartup WW
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1967 Dec; 7(4):429-34. PubMed ID: 6065873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reinforcement for imitation as a social learning determinant with implications for sex-role development.
    Grusec JE; Brinker DB
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1972 Feb; 21(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 5010400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of modeling contingencies in the treatment of food selectivity in children with autism.
    Fu SB; Penrod B; Fernand JK; Whelan CM; Griffith K; Medved S
    Behav Modif; 2015 Nov; 39(6):771-84. PubMed ID: 26134303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES AND RESPONSE VARIABILITY IN PRESCHOOL CHILDREN.
    BENSON E; GRIFFITHS WJ; GRIFFITHS MT
    J Genet Psychol; 1965 Jun; 106():195-200. PubMed ID: 14345946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Model-based reinforcement learning with dimension reduction.
    Tangkaratt V; Morimoto J; Sugiyama M
    Neural Netw; 2016 Dec; 84():1-16. PubMed ID: 27639719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Modification of self-imposed delay of reward through exposure to live and symbolic models.
    Bandura A; Mischel W
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1965 Nov; 2(5):698-705. PubMed ID: 4158333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The acquisition of observing responses in the absence of differential external reinforcement.
    PROKASY WF
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1956 Apr; 49(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 13319523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of reinforcement contingencies on AD/HD: a review and theoretical appraisal.
    Luman M; Oosterlaan J; Sergeant JA
    Clin Psychol Rev; 2005 Feb; 25(2):183-213. PubMed ID: 15642646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Longitudinal investigation on learned helplessness tested under negative and positive reinforcement involving stimulus control.
    Oliveira EC; Hunziker MH
    Behav Processes; 2014 Jul; 106():160-7. PubMed ID: 24814908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Imitation, modeling, and cross-cultural training. AMRL-TR-66-88.
    Zinser O
    AMRL TR; 1966 Jul; ():1-32. PubMed ID: 4163207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in reinforcement learning.
    Pedersen ML; Frank MJ; Biele G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1234-1251. PubMed ID: 27966103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stimulus similarity and the effect of reinforcement in a pseudo-concept identification task.
    Shaffer JP; Remple RK
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Apr; 71(4):593-9. PubMed ID: 5909088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Behavior in a continuous-response task with quasi-determinate, noncontingent reinforcement.
    Rosenberg S
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 May; 71(5):700-5. PubMed ID: 5939712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of intrinsic and extrinsic reinforcement contingencies on learner performance. AMRL-TR-66-138.
    Sullivan HJ; Baker RL; Schutz RE
    AMRL TR; 1966 Dec; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 5298166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Helping children by changing their behavior.
    McBeath M
    Child Welfare; 1973 Feb; 52(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 4717908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Laboratory studies of self-reinforcement (SR) phenomena.
    Martin J
    J Gen Psychol; 1979 Jul; 101(1st Half):103-49. PubMed ID: 114603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Monitoring and reinforcement by parents as a means of automating articulatory responses.
    Shelton RL; Johnson AF; Arndt WB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Dec; 35(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 4643966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Supplementary knowledge of results.
    Maltzman E; Holz WC; Kunze J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1965 Nov; 8(6):385-8. PubMed ID: 5851398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The acquisition and extinction of conditioned eyelid responses as a function of the percentage of fixed ratio random reinforcement.
    GRANT DA; SCHIPPER LM
    J Exp Psychol; 1952 Apr; 43(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 14946341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Partial reinforcement following a long continuous reinforcement acquisition series.
    LEWIS DJ; HARDER DA
    J Genet Psychol; 1959 Dec; 95():207-10. PubMed ID: 14416505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.