These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

44 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 143021)

  • 1. [Femoral prosthesis with thin and elastic stem, cemented or not].
    Pavlansky R; Kubat B; Dubsky B; Gabrielova Z
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1977; 63 Suppl 2():134-5. PubMed ID: 143021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reinforcement of bone cement around the femoral prosthesis tip by pre-coated wire coil: a human cadaver bone study.
    Kim JK; Park JB
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1996; 6(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 8922261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revisions with cemented long-stem prostheses.
    Turner RH; Scheller AD; Emerson RH
    Hip; 1984; ():322-41. PubMed ID: 6396278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design of total hip prosthesis: the femoral stem.
    Brockhurst PJ; Svensson NL
    Med Prog Technol; 1977 Sep; 5(2):73-102. PubMed ID: 927397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cemented fixation of the femur.
    Jasty M
    Instr Course Lect; 1994; 43():373-9. PubMed ID: 9097167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro interface and cement mantle analysis of different femur stem designs.
    Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Siebert CH; Andereya S; Mueller-Rath R; Maus U; Mumme T
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(9):2021-8. PubMed ID: 18514207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Importance of direct contact between the femoral stem and the diaphyseal bone. Concept, realization and results].
    Vives P; Thibaut H; De Lestang M; Dorde T
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1985; 51(2-3):278-87. PubMed ID: 4050384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental study in femoral component total hip replacement: mechanical failures of cement-bone interface with comparison of prosthesis, cement thickness, orientation and plug insertion.
    Savino AW
    Proc Inst Med Chic; 1978; 32(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 662836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Total replacement of the hip joint.
    Riley LH; Hughes JL
    Surg Annu; 1973; 5():157-67. PubMed ID: 4793524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems.
    Huiskes R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Dec; (261):27-38. PubMed ID: 2245558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone cement as a seal protecting the femur from the ingress of particulate debris and femoral osteolysis.
    Harris WH; Smith EJ; Goetz DD
    Instr Course Lect; 1996; 45():183-5. PubMed ID: 8727737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Biomechanical principles of joint replacement].
    Teubner E
    Chirurg; 1981 Nov; 52(11):673-80. PubMed ID: 7307682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
    Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Porous implant systems for prosthesis stabilization.
    Homsy CA; Cain TE; Kessler FB; Anderson MS; King JW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1972; 89():220-35. PubMed ID: 4646261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative in vitro study on the long-term performance of cemented hip stems: validation of a protocol to discriminate between "good" and "bad" designs.
    Paul JP
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):395; author reply 395-6. PubMed ID: 16263127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Procedure in extensive or complete loss of bone substance of the femur following shaft loosening].
    Steinbrink K
    Orthopade; 1987 Aug; 16(4):277-86. PubMed ID: 3658410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Reactions of diaphyseal cortical bone to a cemented prosthesis].
    Coutelier L; Herbert JJ; Herbert A; Vincent A
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1974; 40(5-6):648-64. PubMed ID: 4469729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in the upper femur after low friction arthroplasty.
    Blacker GJ; Charnley J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1978; (137):15-23. PubMed ID: 743822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proximal femoral replacement prostheses.
    Lackman RD
    Semin Arthroplasty; 1994 Apr; 5(2):54-9. PubMed ID: 10147344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of ultrasonic tools in revision arthroplasty procedures.
    Klapper RC; Caillouette JT
    Contemp Orthop; 1990 Mar; 20(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 10148050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.