These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The finishing and early marginal fracture of clinical amalgam restorations. Bryant RW; Collins CJ J Dent; 1989 Jun; 17(3):111-6. PubMed ID: 2768622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Finishing techniques for amalgam restorations: clinical assessment at three years. Bryant RW; Collins CJ Aust Dent J; 1992 Oct; 37(5):333-9. PubMed ID: 1444953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of modified cavity design and finishing techniques on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study. Stratis S; Bryant RW J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Apr; 25(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 9610854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Experimental research on the finishing and polishing of amalgam fillings]. Staehle HJ; Rummler A Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1991; 101(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 1866610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of finishing and polishing procedures on the decision to replace old amalgam restorations: an in vitro study. Oleinisky JC; Baratieri LN; Ritter AV; Felipe LA; de Freitas SF Quintessence Int; 1996 Dec; 27(12):833-40. PubMed ID: 9452677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of modified cavity design and finishing techniques on the margin region of amalgam restorations: a simulated clinical study. Bryant RW Aust Prosthodont J; 1992; 6():39-45. PubMed ID: 1300132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of polishing on the marginal integrity of amalgam restorations. Letzel H; Vrijhoef MM J Oral Rehabil; 1984 Mar; 11(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 6585528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Temperature changes during the finishing of amalgam restorations. van Amerongen JP; Penning C J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Oct; 64(4):455-8. PubMed ID: 2231455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3-year clinical study. Svanberg M Caries Res; 1992; 26(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1423449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A study of different polishing techniques for amalgams and glass-cermet cement by scanning electron microscope (SEM)]. Kakaboura A; Vougiouklakis G; Argiri G Hell Stomatol Chron; 1989; 33(4):217-25. PubMed ID: 2518600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Finishing of amalgam restorations: to what degree is it necessary? Jeffrey IW; Pitts NB J Dent; 1989 Apr; 17(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 2732365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surface roughness of glass-ceramic insert-composite restorations: assessing several polishing techniques. Ashe MJ; Tripp GA; Eichmiller FC; George LA; Meiers JC J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Oct; 127(10):1495-500. PubMed ID: 8908919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Optimizing marginal fit of amalgam restorations on the cervico-interproximal aspect]. Hannig M; Lauffs HJ; Albers HK Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Jul; 44(7):548-51. PubMed ID: 2630287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of finishing and polishing on the decision to replace existing amalgam restorations. Cardoso M; Baratieri LN; Ritter AV Quintessence Int; 1999 Jun; 30(6):413-8. PubMed ID: 10635277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of amalgam bonding in Class I and II restorations. Mahler DB; Engle JH J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Jan; 131(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 10649871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]