119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1430530)
1. Instrument effects on smoothness discrimination.
Schoen DH
J Dent Educ; 1992 Nov; 56(11):741-5. PubMed ID: 1430530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of tactile discrimination associated with varying weights of explorers.
Simmer-Beck M; Branson BG; Mitchell TV; Holt L
J Dent Educ; 2007 May; 71(5):687-93. PubMed ID: 17493978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of scaling error detection.
Biller IR; Kerber PE
J Dent Educ; 1980 Apr; 44(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 6987288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Instruments and methods for the quantitative measurement of factors affecting hygienist/dentist efforts during scaling and root planing of the teeth.
White DJ; Cox ER; Arends J; Nieborg JH; Leydsman H; Wieringa DW; Dijkman AG; Ruben JR
J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(2 Spec No):32-40. PubMed ID: 9238895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficiency of subgingival calculus removal with the Vector-system compared to ultrasonic scaling and hand instrumentation in vitro.
Braun A; Krause F; Frentzen M; Jepsen S
J Periodontal Res; 2005 Feb; 40(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 15613079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Calculus detection calibration among dental hygiene faculty members utilizing dental endoscopy: a pilot study.
Partido BB; Jones AA; English DL; Nguyen CA; Jacks ME
J Dent Educ; 2015 Feb; 79(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 25640616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparative data on the clinical skills of students in dentistry and dental hygienists in scaling and root planing technics].
Wilson SG; Tsutsui PT; Checchi L
Mondo Odontostomatol; 1985; 27(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 3894940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Interrater agreement on subgingival calculus detection following scaling.
Pippin DJ; Feil P
J Dent Educ; 1992 May; 56(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 1629469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of curet and ultrasonics on root surfaces.
Cross-Poline GN; Stach DJ; Newman SM
Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):131-3. PubMed ID: 8599589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of subgingival calculus with a novel LED-based optical probe.
Krause F; Braun A; Jepsen S; Frentzen M
J Periodontol; 2005 Jul; 76(7):1202-6. PubMed ID: 16018765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dental hygiene faculty calibration in the evaluation of calculus detection.
Garland KV; Newell KJ
J Dent Educ; 2009 Mar; 73(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 19289727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Root surface removal and resultant surface texture with diamond-coated ultrasonic inserts: an in vitro and SEM study.
Vastardis S; Yukna RA; Rice DA; Mercante D
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 15842261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of calculus detection among dental hygienists using an explorer and ultrasonic insert.
Partido BB; Webb CA; Carr MP
Int J Dent Hyg; 2019 May; 17(2):192-198. PubMed ID: 30714331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo and in vitro effects of an Er:YAG laser, a GaAlAs diode laser, and scaling and root planing on periodontally diseased root surfaces: a comparative histologic study.
Schwarz F; Sculean A; Berakdar M; Szathmari L; Georg T; Becker J
Lasers Surg Med; 2003; 32(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 12766958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of surface smoothness detected by a periodontal probe.
Atilla G; Kandemir S
J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1994 Dec; 36(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 7869128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effectiveness of InGaAsP diode laser radiation to detect subgingival calculus as compared to an explorer.
Folwaczny M; Heym R; Mehl A; Hickel R
J Periodontol; 2004 May; 75(5):744-9. PubMed ID: 15212357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [In vitro comparison of instruments used for root canal preparation. II. Effectiveness of the instruments].
Bartha K; Dobó NC; Bernáth M; Szabó J
Fogorv Sz; 1995 Aug; 88(8):261-9. PubMed ID: 8522021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effective mechanical instrumentation requires a light, controlled touch.
O'Hehir TE
RDH; 1995 Jun; 15(6):32, 35. PubMed ID: 10332398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of handling-relevant factors on the behaviour of a novel calculus-detection device.
Meissner G; Oehme B; Strackeljan J; Kocher T
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 15766378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Current concepts and advances in manual and power-driven instrumentation.
Oda S; Nitta H; Setoguchi T; Izumi Y; Ishikawa I
Periodontol 2000; 2004; 36():45-58. PubMed ID: 15330943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
