These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1430530)

  • 1. Instrument effects on smoothness discrimination.
    Schoen DH
    J Dent Educ; 1992 Nov; 56(11):741-5. PubMed ID: 1430530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of tactile discrimination associated with varying weights of explorers.
    Simmer-Beck M; Branson BG; Mitchell TV; Holt L
    J Dent Educ; 2007 May; 71(5):687-93. PubMed ID: 17493978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of scaling error detection.
    Biller IR; Kerber PE
    J Dent Educ; 1980 Apr; 44(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 6987288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Instruments and methods for the quantitative measurement of factors affecting hygienist/dentist efforts during scaling and root planing of the teeth.
    White DJ; Cox ER; Arends J; Nieborg JH; Leydsman H; Wieringa DW; Dijkman AG; Ruben JR
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(2 Spec No):32-40. PubMed ID: 9238895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficiency of subgingival calculus removal with the Vector-system compared to ultrasonic scaling and hand instrumentation in vitro.
    Braun A; Krause F; Frentzen M; Jepsen S
    J Periodontal Res; 2005 Feb; 40(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 15613079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Calculus detection calibration among dental hygiene faculty members utilizing dental endoscopy: a pilot study.
    Partido BB; Jones AA; English DL; Nguyen CA; Jacks ME
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Feb; 79(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 25640616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparative data on the clinical skills of students in dentistry and dental hygienists in scaling and root planing technics].
    Wilson SG; Tsutsui PT; Checchi L
    Mondo Odontostomatol; 1985; 27(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 3894940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interrater agreement on subgingival calculus detection following scaling.
    Pippin DJ; Feil P
    J Dent Educ; 1992 May; 56(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 1629469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of curet and ultrasonics on root surfaces.
    Cross-Poline GN; Stach DJ; Newman SM
    Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):131-3. PubMed ID: 8599589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of subgingival calculus with a novel LED-based optical probe.
    Krause F; Braun A; Jepsen S; Frentzen M
    J Periodontol; 2005 Jul; 76(7):1202-6. PubMed ID: 16018765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dental hygiene faculty calibration in the evaluation of calculus detection.
    Garland KV; Newell KJ
    J Dent Educ; 2009 Mar; 73(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 19289727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Root surface removal and resultant surface texture with diamond-coated ultrasonic inserts: an in vitro and SEM study.
    Vastardis S; Yukna RA; Rice DA; Mercante D
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 15842261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of calculus detection among dental hygienists using an explorer and ultrasonic insert.
    Partido BB; Webb CA; Carr MP
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2019 May; 17(2):192-198. PubMed ID: 30714331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vivo and in vitro effects of an Er:YAG laser, a GaAlAs diode laser, and scaling and root planing on periodontally diseased root surfaces: a comparative histologic study.
    Schwarz F; Sculean A; Berakdar M; Szathmari L; Georg T; Becker J
    Lasers Surg Med; 2003; 32(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 12766958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of surface smoothness detected by a periodontal probe.
    Atilla G; Kandemir S
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1994 Dec; 36(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 7869128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effectiveness of InGaAsP diode laser radiation to detect subgingival calculus as compared to an explorer.
    Folwaczny M; Heym R; Mehl A; Hickel R
    J Periodontol; 2004 May; 75(5):744-9. PubMed ID: 15212357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [In vitro comparison of instruments used for root canal preparation. II. Effectiveness of the instruments].
    Bartha K; Dobó NC; Bernáth M; Szabó J
    Fogorv Sz; 1995 Aug; 88(8):261-9. PubMed ID: 8522021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effective mechanical instrumentation requires a light, controlled touch.
    O'Hehir TE
    RDH; 1995 Jun; 15(6):32, 35. PubMed ID: 10332398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of handling-relevant factors on the behaviour of a novel calculus-detection device.
    Meissner G; Oehme B; Strackeljan J; Kocher T
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 15766378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Current concepts and advances in manual and power-driven instrumentation.
    Oda S; Nitta H; Setoguchi T; Izumi Y; Ishikawa I
    Periodontol 2000; 2004; 36():45-58. PubMed ID: 15330943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.