These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14313318)

  • 21. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of silver-plated and stone dies from rubber-base impressions.
    Cooney JP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1974 Sep; 32(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 4612140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Single-stage impression technic for crowns and bridgework (double mix impression)].
    Lehmann KM; Burgdorf HO
    ZWR; 1978 May; 87(9):434-6. PubMed ID: 349948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cost analysis of relined mercaptan rubber impressions.
    Gullett CE; Podshadley AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Aug; 42(2):180-2. PubMed ID: 379319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Agar impression technic especially for cast crowns].
    Tsuzuki H
    Hotetsu Rinsho; 1981; (Spec issue):163-72. PubMed ID: 7043430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Copper-band impressions for complete crown abutments.
    Orstavik J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1974 May; 31(5):547-55. PubMed ID: 4595891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cast impression coping technique.
    Vasilakis GJ; Vasilakis MD
    Gen Dent; 2003; 51(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 15061334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impressions of single preparations using a copper band-shell.
    Kimmelman BB; Lerman H
    J Prosthet Dent; 1971 Aug; 26(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 4933161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of impression-die systems on crown margins.
    Plekavich EJ; Joncas JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1983 Jun; 49(6):772-6. PubMed ID: 6348258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of impression materials and techniques on the marginal fit of metal castings.
    Gelbard S; Aoskar Y; Zalkind M; Stern N
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Jan; 71(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 8120837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A clinical trial to compare double-arch and complete-arch impression techniques in the provision of indirect restorations.
    Lane DA; Randall RC; Lane NS; Wilson NH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 12616233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions.
    Zarauz C; Valverde A; Martinez-Rus F; Hassan B; Pradies G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 May; 20(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 26362778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Reversible hydrocolloids].
    Malquarti G; Martin JP
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1990; 19(3):197-209. PubMed ID: 2218271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: impression materials and technique.
    Wassell RW; Barker D; Walls AW
    Br Dent J; 2002 Jun; 192(12):679-84, 687-90. PubMed ID: 12125794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Impression technic with silicone containing impression materials].
    Schwindling R
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1966 Aug; 21(8):930-6. PubMed ID: 5340384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The new silicon-rubber impression material "Xirux" in enlargement of prostheses and in indirect inlay-technic].
    Schneider W
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1965 Nov; 20(11):1226-7. PubMed ID: 5319780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The problem of impressions in the construction of bridges and crowns].
    Singer F
    Odontostomatol Implantoprotesi; 1977; 3(1):47, 49, 51. PubMed ID: 351496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Total impressions of olclusion using 2 impression materials].
    Paradis G
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1976; 5(2):139-42. PubMed ID: 785572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Full band impressions].
    Morel F; Gerlach A; Bois D
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1990; 19(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 2218275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners.
    Abdel-Azim T; Rogers K; Elathamna E; Zandinejad A; Metz M; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.