These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14313318)

  • 41. [Dental impression technic--crown bridges].
    Suzuki M; Otake H
    Shiyo; 1984 Nov; 32(11):376-80. PubMed ID: 6396450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Full-mouth impressions of preparations intended to receive ceramic-metallic crowns].
    Putz M; Cuvelliez F
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1987; 42(3):75-8. PubMed ID: 3317562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Ensuring accuracy and predictability with double-arch impressions.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Aug; 139(8):1123-5. PubMed ID: 18682627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials in custom-made and stock trays.
    Valderhaug J; Fløystrand F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Oct; 52(4):514-7. PubMed ID: 6389833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Impression materials, impression technic, and model preparation for crowns and bridges--a literature review].
    Lehmann KM
    ZWR; 1987 Oct; 96(10):914, 916-7. PubMed ID: 3330884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns.
    Berrendero S; Salido MP; Valverde A; Ferreiroa A; Pradíes G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Dec; 20(9):2403-2410. PubMed ID: 26800669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Implications of choice of products and impression technique on the thickness of the dento-prosthetic interface of the CAD-CAM crowns].
    Nasir E; Kamel N; Moussa EH; Hardan L; Zebouni E
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2016 Jun; 39(154):25-37. PubMed ID: 30234272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The quality of impressions for crowns and bridges: an assessment of the work received at three commercial dental laboratories. assessing the quality of the impressions of prepared teeth.
    Storey D; Coward TJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2013 Jun; 21(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 23888527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Impression technics for crowns and bridgework].
    Böhme W
    Stomatol DDR; 1977 Sep; 27(9):561-4. PubMed ID: 337593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Complete impressions with thiokol elastomers using customized chambered impression trays in fixed dentures].
    Dumont A
    J Dent Que; 1984 Jan; 21():47-53. PubMed ID: 6379005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Studies on the effect of various manipulation techniques on rubber base impressions].
    Arola J
    Suom Hammaslaak Toim; 1970; 66(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 4912099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Individual trays for impressions using elastomers].
    Wirz J; Castagnola L; Garberoglio U
    Riv Odontoiatr Amici Brugg; 1982; 1(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 6761613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Clinically oriented evaluation of the accuracy of commonly used impression materials.
    Tjan AH; Whang SB; Tjan AH; Sarkissian R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Jul; 56(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 3522878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Faster, neater, more accurate rubber base impressions.
    Steinberg GJ
    Gen Dent; 1980; 28(2):66-7. PubMed ID: 7005021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
    Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An effect of tray design and material retention on the linear dimensional changes in polysulfide impressions.
    Walters RA; Spurrier S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Mar; 63(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 2407824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [A new impression material for impressions of single prepared teeth destined to be covered with gold].
    Landt H
    DDZ; 1968 Jan; 22(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 4866941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Clinical marginal fit of zirconia crowns and patients' preferences for impression techniques using intraoral digital scanner versus polyvinyl siloxane material.
    Sakornwimon N; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):386-391. PubMed ID: 28222872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The quality of impressions for crowns and bridges: an assessment of the work received at three commercial dental laboratories. assessing qualities of impressions that may lead to occlusal discrepancies with indirect restorations.
    Storey D; Coward TJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2014 Mar; 22(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 24922994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.