These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14313978)

  • 1. PERCEIVED SLANT AS A FUNCTION OF RELATIVE HEIGHT.
    DUNN BE
    Percept Mot Skills; 1965 Jun; 20():708. PubMed ID: 14313978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative height and relative size as monocular depth cues in the trapezoid.
    Dunn BE; Thomas SW
    Percept Mot Skills; 1966 Feb; 22(1):275-81. PubMed ID: 5906730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On size-perception in the absence of cues for distance.
    WALLACH H; McKENNA V
    Am J Psychol; 1960 Sep; 73():458-60. PubMed ID: 13782816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of perspective and slant on perception of apparent size and distance.
    Thompson JG; Valenti CA; Schiffman HR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Oct; 47(2):575-82. PubMed ID: 724393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EFFECTIVE DIFFERENCE IN INFLUENCE OF RELATIVE SIZE ON PERCEIVED RELATIVE DISTANCE.
    EPSTEIN W
    Percept Mot Skills; 1964 Apr; 18():383-4. PubMed ID: 14166025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. RELATIVE SIZE IN ISOLATION AS A STIMULUS FOR RELATIVE PERCEIVED DISTANCE.
    EPSTEIN W; BARATZ SS
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Jun; 67():507-13. PubMed ID: 14155412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vertical position as a cue to pictorial depth: height in the picture plane versus distance to the horizon.
    Gardner JS; Austerweil JL; Palmer SE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):445-53. PubMed ID: 20139458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of size on visual slant.
    Freeman RB
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Jan; 71(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 5902148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SOME CONDITIONS OF THE EFFECT OF RELATIVE SIZE ON PERCEIVED RELATIVE DISTANCE.
    EPSTEIN W; FRANKLIN S
    Am J Psychol; 1965 Sep; 78():466-70. PubMed ID: 14344090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Focus cues affect perceived depth.
    Watt SJ; Akeley K; Ernst MO; Banks MS
    J Vis; 2005 Dec; 5(10):834-62. PubMed ID: 16441189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The paradoxical moon illusions.
    Gilinsky AS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Feb; 50(1):271-83. PubMed ID: 7367178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Infants' sensitivity to familiar size: the effect of memory on spatial perception.
    Granrud CE; Haake RJ; Yonas A
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 May; 37(5):459-66. PubMed ID: 4047909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relation of perceived size to perceived distance: an analysis of Gruber's data.
    GILINSKY AS
    Am J Psychol; 1955 Sep; 68(3):476-80. PubMed ID: 13248987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A TEST OF THE INVARIANCE OF THE RATIO OF PERCEIVED SIZE TO PERCEIVED DISTANCE.
    GOGEL WC; WIST ER; HARKER GS
    Am J Psychol; 1963 Dec; 76():537-53. PubMed ID: 14082652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of motion parallax and perspective cues on perceived size and distance.
    Tozawa J; Oyama T
    Perception; 2006; 35(8):1007-23. PubMed ID: 17076062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Eye movements and space perception.
    Wist ER
    Bibl Ophthalmol; 1972; 82():348-57. PubMed ID: 4568583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Function of cues in the perceptual learning of visual slant: an experimental and theoretical analysis.
    Freeman RB
    Psychol Monogr; 1966; 80(2):1-29. PubMed ID: 5971459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vertical-size disparities are temporally integrated for slant perception.
    Fukuda K; Kaneko H; Matsumiya K
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2749-56. PubMed ID: 16600323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Types of size disparity and the perception of surface slant.
    Pierce BJ; Howard IP
    Perception; 1997; 26(12):1503-17. PubMed ID: 9616478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Absolute threshold for visual slant: the effect of stimulus size and retinal perspective.
    Freeman RB
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Feb; 71(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 5903002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.